Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22044694›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2012

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of polyphenon E in prostate cancer patients before prostatectomy: evaluation of potential chemopreventive activities.

Mike M Nguyen, Frederick R Ahmann, Raymond B Nagle, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Joseph A Tangrea, Howard L Parnes, Mitchell H Sokoloff, Matthew B Gretzer, H-H Sherry Chow

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Effects of a green tea extract, Polyphenon E, on systemic biomarkers of growth factor signalling in women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2015
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mike M NguyenDivision of Urology, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. mnguyen@surgery.arizona.edu
Frederick R Ahmann
Raymond B Nagle
Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
Joseph A Tangrea
Howard L Parnes
Mitchell H Sokoloff
Matthew B Gretzer
H-H Sherry Chow
University of Arizona · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Dan Theodorescu · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
PHASE I AND II CLINICAL TRIALS OF CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENTS-261035-261035158N01CN035158 · CN · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ALBERTS, DAVID S · 2004 to 2006
–
NCI NIH HHS CA023074NCI NIH HHS N01 CN035158NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compelling preclinical and pilot clinical data support the role of green tea polyphenols in prostate cancer prevention. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of polyphenon E (enriched green tea polyphenol extract) in men with prostate cancer scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy. The study aimed to determine the bioavailability of green tea polyphenols in prostate tissue and to measure its effects on systemic and tissue biomarkers of prostate cancer carcinogenesis. Participants received either polyphenon E (containing 800 mg epigallocatechin gallate) or placebo daily for 3 to 6 weeks before surgery. Following the intervention, green tea polyphenol levels in the prostatectomy tissue were low to undetectable. Polyphenon E intervention resulted in favorable but not statistically significant changes in serum prostate-specific antigen, serum insulin-like growth factor axis, and oxidative DNA damage in blood leukocytes. Tissue biomarkers of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis in the prostatectomy tissue did not differ between the treatment arms. The proportion of subjects who had a decrease in Gleason score between biopsy and surgical specimens was greater in those on polyphenon E but was not statistically significant. The study's findings of low bioavailability and/or bioaccumulation of green tea polyphenols in prostate tissue and statistically insignificant changes in systemic and tissue biomarkers from 3 to 6 weeks of administration suggests that prostate cancer preventive activity of green tea polyphenols, if occurring, may be through indirect means and/or that the activity may need to be evaluated with longer intervention durations, repeated dosing, or in patients at earlier stages of the disease.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyTeaAgedBiological AvailabilityBiomarkers, TumorCatechinDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCatechinpolyphenon ETea

Identifiers

PMID22044694
PMCPMC3273617
OpenAlexW2113061094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.