ReviewCurrent protein & peptide science2012
Determining the orientation and localization of membrane-bound peptides.
Review in Current protein & peptide science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on Bitter Peptides in the Field of Bioinformatics: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Prediction of amphipathic helix-membrane interactions with Rosetta.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Review
- The 2018 biomembrane curvature and remodeling roadmap.Journal of physics D: Applied physics · 2018Article
- Structural and functional implications of the interaction between macrolide antibiotics and bile acids.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2015Article
- Capability of ganglioside GM1 in modulating interactions, structure, location and dynamics of peptides/proteins: biophysical approaches: interaction of ganglioside GM1 with peptides/proteins.Glycoconjugate journal · 2014Article
- Solution NMR studies on the orientation of membrane-bound peptides and proteins by paramagnetic probes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013Review
- Determining the depth of insertion of dynamically invisible membrane peptides by gel-phase ¹H spin diffusion heteronuclear correlation NMR.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2013Article
- 2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl 6-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside as a selective tag for cysteines in proteins.Carbohydrate research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many naturally occurring bioactive peptides bind to biological membranes. Studying and elucidating the mode of interaction is often an essential step to understand their molecular and biological functions. To obtain the complete orientation and immersion depth of such compounds in the membrane or a membrane-mimetic system, a number of methods are available, which are separated in this review into four main classes: solution NMR, solid-state NMR, EPR and other methods. Solution NMR methods include the Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE) between peptide and membrane signals, residual dipolar couplings and the use of paramagnetic probes, either within the membrane-mimetic or in the solvent. The vast array of solid state NMR methods to study membrane-bound peptide orientation and localization includes the anisotropic chemical shift, PISA wheels, dipolar waves, the GALA, MAOS and REDOR methods and again the use of paramagnetic additives on relaxation rates. Paramagnetic additives, with their effect on spectral linewidths, have also been used in EPR spectroscopy. Additionally, the orientation of a peptide within a membrane can be obtained by the anisotropic hyperfine tensor of a rigidly attached nitroxide label. Besides these magnetic resonance techniques a series of other methods to probe the orientation of peptides in membranes has been developed, consisting of fluorescence-, infrared- and oriented circular dichroism spectroscopy, colorimetry, interface-sensitive X-ray and neutron scattering and Quartz crystal microbalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.