Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22043301›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Survival outcomes and effect of early vs. deferred cART among HIV-infected patients diagnosed at the time of an AIDS-defining event: a cohort analysis.

Jose M Miro, Christian Manzardo, Cristina Mussini, Margaret Johnson, Antonella d'Arminio Monforte, Andrea Antinori, M John Gill, Laura Sighinolfi, Caterina Uberti-Foppa, Vanni Borghi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Jose M MiroHospital Cliníc-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Christian Manzardo
Cristina Mussini
Margaret Johnson
Antonella d'Arminio Monforte
Andrea Antinori
M John Gill
Laura Sighinolfi
Caterina Uberti-Foppa
Vanni Borghi
Caroline Sabin
Late Presenters Investigators
Universitat de Barcelona · ESAlberta Hip and Knee Clinic · CAIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · ITPoliclinico di Modena · ITThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe analyzed clinical progression among persons diagnosed with HIV at the time of an AIDS-defining event, and assessed the impact on outcome of timing of combined antiretroviral treatment (cART).

methodsRetrospective, European and Canadian multicohort study.. Patients were diagnosed with HIV from 1997-2004 and had clinical AIDS from 30 days before to 14 days after diagnosis. Clinical progression (new AIDS event, death) was described using Kaplan-Meier analysis stratifying by type of AIDS event. Factors associated with progression were identified with multivariable Cox regression. Progression rates were compared between those starting early (<30 days after AIDS event) or deferred (30-270 days after AIDS event) cART.

resultsThe median (interquartile range) CD4 count and viral load (VL) at diagnosis of the 584 patients were 42 (16, 119) cells/µL and 5.2 (4.5, 5.7) log(10) copies/mL. Clinical progression was observed in 165 (28.3%) patients. Older age, a higher VL at diagnosis, and a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (vs. other AIDS events) were independently associated with disease progression. Of 366 patients with an opportunistic infection, 178 (48.6%) received early cART. There was no significant difference in clinical progression between those initiating cART early and those deferring treatment (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32 [95% confidence interval 0.87, 2.00], p = 0.20).

conclusionsOlder patients and patients with high VL or NHL at diagnosis had a worse outcome. Our data suggest that earlier initiation of cART may be beneficial among HIV-infected patients diagnosed with clinical AIDS in our setting.

Indexed as

Survival AnalysisAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCanadaCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionEuropeFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID22043301
PMCPMC3197144
OpenAlexW1971222276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.