Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22043009›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2011

Quantifying antigen-specific CD4 T cells during a viral infection: CD4 T cell responses are larger than we think.

Daniel S McDermott, Steven M Varga

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lymph node-targeted STING agonist nanovaccine against chronic HBV infection.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. OMIP-099: 31-color spectral flow cytometry panel to investigate the steady-state phenotype of human T cells.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CD115Cell reports · 2023
    Article
  16. Loss of CD4Immunity · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel S McDermottInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Steven M Varga

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007485 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Kevin L Legge · 1995 to 2026
$5.4M
Immunopathology mediated by RSV-specific CD4 T cellsR01AI063520 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI VARGA, STEVEN M · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063520NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of virus-specific CD8 T cells increases substantially during an acute infection. Up to 90% of CD8 T cells are virus specific following lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection. In contrast, studies identifying virus-specific CD4 T cell epitopes have indicated that CD4 T cells often recognize a broader array of Ags than CD8 T cells, consequently making it difficult to accurately quantify the total magnitude of pathogen-specific CD4 T cell responses. In this study, we show that CD4 T cells become CD11a(hi)CD49d(+) after LCMV infection and retain this expression pattern into memory. During the effector phase, all the LCMV-specific IFN-γ(+) CD4 T cells display a CD11a(hi)CD49d(+) cell surface expression phenotype. In addition, only memory CD11a(hi)CD49d(+) CD4 T cells make IFN-γ after stimulation. Furthermore, upon secondary LCMV challenge, only CD11a(hi)CD49d(+) memory CD4 T cells from LCMV-immune mice undergo proliferative expansion, demonstrating that CD11a(hi)CD49d(+) CD4 T cells are truly Ag specific. Using the combination of CD11a and CD49d, we demonstrate that up to 50% of the CD4 T cells are virus specific during the peak of the LCMV response. Our results indicate that the magnitude of the virus-specific CD4 T cell response is much greater than previously recognized.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferAnimalsAntigens, CDArenaviridae InfectionsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell SeparationFemaleFlow CytometryImmunologic MemoryImmunophenotypingLymphocyte ActivationLymphocytic choriomeningitis virusMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicAntigens, CD

Identifiers

PMID22043009
PMCPMC3221938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.