Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22042988›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2011

Influence of pH on Ca²⁺ current and its control of electrical and Ca²⁺ signaling in ventricular myocytes.

Noriko Saegusa, Emma Moorhouse, Richard D Vaughan-Jones, Kenneth W Spitzer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A novel transgenic reporter of extracellular acidification in zebrafish elucidates skeletal muscle T-tubule pH regulation.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparing the effects of chemical CaJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Extracellular ATP-Induced Alterations in Extracellular HFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Regulation of CaCell calcium · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Regulation of CaJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Action Potential Shortening and Impairment of Cardiac Function by Ablation ofCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Noriko SaegusaDepartment of Physiology, Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Emma Moorhouse
Richard D Vaughan-Jones
Kenneth W Spitzer
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

pH REGULATION IN HEART CELLSR37HL042873 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SPITZER, KENNETH W · 2003 to 2012
$2.0M
British Heart Foundation RG/08/016/26423NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL042873NHLBI NIH HHS R37HL042873Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulation of L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca,L)) by H(+) ions in cardiac myocytes is controversial, with widely discrepant responses reported. The pH sensitivity of I(Ca,L) was investigated (whole cell voltage clamp) while measuring intracellular Ca(2+) (Ca(2+)(i)) or pH(i) (epifluorescence microscopy) in rabbit and guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Selectively reducing extracellular or intracellular pH (pH(o) 6.5 and pH(i) 6.7) had opposite effects on I(Ca,L) gating, shifting the steady-state activation and inactivation curves to the right and left, respectively, along the voltage axis. At low pH(o), this decreased I(Ca,L), whereas at low pH(i), it increased I(Ca,L) at clamp potentials negative to 0 mV, although the current decreased at more positive potentials. When Ca(2+)(i) was buffered with BAPTA, the stimulatory effect of low pH(i) was even more marked, with essentially no inhibition. We conclude that extracellular H(+) ions inhibit whereas intracellular H(+) ions can stimulate I(Ca,L). Low pH(i) and pH(o) effects on I(Ca,L) were additive, tending to cancel when appropriately combined. They persisted after inhibition of calmodulin kinase II (with KN-93). Effects are consistent with H(+) ion screening of fixed negative charge at the sarcolemma, with additional channel block by H(+)(o) and Ca(2+)(i). Action potential duration (APD) was also strongly H(+) sensitive, being shortened by low pH(o), but lengthened by low pH(i), caused mainly by H(+)-induced changes in late Ca(2+) entry through the L-type Ca(2+) channel. Kinetic analyses of pH-sensitive channel gating, when combined with whole cell modeling, successfully predicted the APD changes, plus many of the accompanying changes in Ca(2+) signaling. We conclude that the pH(i)-versus-pH(o) control of I(Ca,L) will exert a major influence on electrical and Ca(2+)-dependent signaling during acid-base disturbances in the heart.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCalcium SignalingCells, CulturedChelating AgentsEgtazic AcidGuinea PigsHeart VentriclesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMyocytes, CardiacRabbitsSarcoplasmic Reticulum1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acidCalciumChelating AgentsEgtazic Acid

Identifiers

PMID22042988
PMCPMC3206307
OpenAlexW2106376569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.