Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22042915›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2011

Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans.

Joshua M Tybur, Steven W Gangestad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Host-Parasite Coevolution in Primates.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Why do people vary in disgust?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health, Anticipated Partner Infidelity, and Jealousy in Men and Women.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior · 2015
    Article
  17. The sociality-health-fitness nexus: synthesis, conclusions and future directions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  18. Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joshua M TyburDepartment of Social and Organizational Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Steven W Gangestad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mate preferences may operate in part to mitigate the threats posed by infectious disease. In this paper, we outline various ways in which preferring healthy mates can offer direct benefits in terms of pathogen avoidance and indirect benefits in terms of heritable immunity to offspring, as well as the costs that may constrain mate preferences for health. We then pay special attention to empirical work on mate preferences in humans given the depth and breadth of research on human mating. We review this literature and comment on the degree to which human mate preferences may reflect preferences for health.

Indexed as

AnimalsCommunicable DiseasesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansMaleMating Preference, AnimalReproduction

Identifiers

PMID22042915
PMCPMC3189358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.