ArticleGenetics2012
Measuring selection coefficients below 10(-3): method, questions, and prospects.
Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracking Inter- and Intraspecific Bacterial Competition in Pairwise Assays Using a Transient Fluorescent Dye.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Polygenic backgrounds influence phenotypic consequences of variants in cells, individuals, and populations.Cell genomics · 2026Review
- Putting BASIL in a BLT: A Bayesian filtering method for estimating the fitness effects of nascent adaptive mutations.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- An Extension of Muller's Sheltering Hypothesis for the Evolution of Sex Chromosome Gene Content.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Evolution of Functional Genomic Diversity During a Bottleneck.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Linking selection to demography in experimental evolution of active death in a unicellular organism.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Reversions mask the contribution of adaptive evolution in microbiomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Temperature dependence of the mutation rate towards antibiotic resistance.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024Article
- Approximate Bayesian computational methods to estimate the strength of divergent selection in population genomics models.Journal of Computational Mathematics and Data Science · 2024Article
- Measuring differential fitness costs and interactions between genetic cassettes using fluorescent spectrophotometry.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Predicting bacterial interaction outcomes from monoculture growth and supernatant assays.ISME communications · 2024Article
- Phenotype Design Space Provides a Mechanistic Framework Relating Molecular Parameters to Phenotype Diversity Available for Selection.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
- Extreme Sensitivity of Fitness to Environmental Conditions: Lessons from #1BigBatch.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Distribution of fitness effects of cross-species transformation reveals potential for fast adaptive evolution.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- Neural networks enable efficient and accurate simulation-based inference of evolutionary parameters from adaptation dynamics.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Evolutionary Pathways and Trajectories in Antibiotic Resistance.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021Article
- Precise measurement of the fitness effects of spontaneous mutations by droplet digital PCR in Burkholderia cenocepacia.Genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring fitness with precision is a key issue in evolutionary biology, particularly in studying mutations of small effects. It is usually thought that sampling error and drift prevent precise measurement of very small fitness effects. We circumvented these limits by using a new combined approach to measuring and analyzing fitness. We estimated the mutational fitness effect (MFE) of three independent mini-Tn10 transposon insertion mutations by conducting competition experiments in large populations of Escherichia coli under controlled laboratory conditions. Using flow cytometry to assess genotype frequencies from very large samples alleviated the problem of sampling error, while the effect of drift was controlled by using large populations and massive replication of fitness measures. Furthermore, with a set of four competition experiments between ancestral and mutant genotypes, we were able to decompose fitness measures into four estimated parameters that account for fitness effects of our fluorescent marker (α), the mutation (β), epistasis between the mutation and the marker (γ), and departure from transitivity (τ). Our method allowed us to estimate mean selection coefficients to a precision of 2 × 10(-4). We also found small, but significant, epistatic interactions between the allelic effects of mutations and markers and confirmed that fitness effects were transitive in most cases. Unexpectedly, we also detected variation in measures of s that were significantly bigger than expected due to drift alone, indicating the existence of cryptic variation, even in fully controlled experiments. Overall our results indicate that selection coefficients are best understood as being distributed, representing a limit on the precision with which selection can be measured, even under controlled laboratory conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.