Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22041951›Full record

GuidelineAnnals of internal medicine2011

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.

Amir Qaseem, Roger Chou, Linda L Humphrey, Melissa Starkey, Paul Shekelle, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Annals of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03243708 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Title: EHR Embedded Risk Calculator vs. Standard VTE Prophylaxis for Medical Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2017 to 2019Enrolled90,537ConditionsVenous ThromboembolismArmsRisk calculator
NCT03286985 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Prevalence and Incidence of Deep Venous Thrombosis in General ICU Patients Receiving Enoxaparine Prophylaxis

TypeobservationalSponsorMasaryk Hospital Krajská zdravotní a.s.Ran2017 to 2017Enrolled200ConditionsDeep Venous Thrombosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 287 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amir QaseemAmerican College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, USA. aqaseem@acponline.org
Roger Chou
Linda L Humphrey
Melissa Starkey
Paul Shekelle
Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
West Los Angeles College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

descriptionThe American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism for hospitalized nonsurgical patients (medical patients and patients with acute stroke).

methodsThis guideline is based on published literature on the topic from 1950 through April 2011 that was identified by using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and reference lists of pertinent randomized trials and systematic reviews to identify additional reports. Searches were limited to randomized trials and English-language publications. The primary outcome for this guideline was total mortality up to 120 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic deep venous thrombosis; all pulmonary embolisms; fatal pulmonary embolism; all bleeding events; major bleeding events; and, for mechanical prophylaxis, effects on skin. This guideline grades the evidence and recommendations by using the ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends assessment of the risk for thromboembolism and bleeding in medical (including stroke) patients prior to initiation of prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends pharmacologic prophylaxis with heparin or a related drug for venous thromboembolism in medical (including stroke) patients unless the assessed risk for bleeding outweighs the likely benefits (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 3: ACP recommends against the use of mechanical prophylaxis with graduated compression stockings for prevention of venous thromboembolism (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). POLICY IMPLICATION: ACP does not support the application of performance measures in medical (including stroke) patients that promotes universal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regardless of risk.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAnticoagulantsHemorrhageHeparinHospital MortalityHumansPulmonary EmbolismRisk AssessmentStockings, CompressionStrokeVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsHeparin

Identifiers

PMID22041951
OpenAlexW2111448024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.