ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology2012
A review on the toxicity and non-target effects of macrocyclic lactones in terrestrial and aquatic environments.
Review in Current pharmaceutical biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 358 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rapid evidence assessment of the potential risk to the environment presented by active ingredients in the UK's most commonly sold companion animal parasiticides.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Dog Waste Creates a Preference-Performance Mismatch for Urban Dung Beetles.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Ecotoxicity evaluation of thymol in tunneller dung beetles (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae) as a natural alternative to ecotoxic anthelmintics.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Development and characterization of ivermectin nanoformulations for topical acaricidal activity against Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploratory Evaluation ofVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Evidence of Pervasive Legacy of Land Use Change on Dung Beetles in Central European Grazed Grasslands.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Efficacy of injectable versus topical formulation of ivermectin against Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes feeding on different body locations of treated Holstein calves.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Efficacy of toxic sugar bait with ivermectin against two fly species (Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae) of medical and veterinary importance.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- The Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren, 1972): A Persistent Global Invader and the Search for Effective Control.Neotropical entomology · 2025Review
- Does Ivermectin Pollute the Surroundings of Swine Farms?Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Therapeutic and Formulation Advances of Ivermectin in Veterinary and Human Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Comparative susceptibility of wild and laboratory-reared Aedes and Anopheles larvae to ivermectin.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Treatment of cattle with ivermectin and its effect on dung degradation and larval abundance in a tropical savanna setting.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Ivermectin causes adverse effects on the metabolic rate and thermoregulatory capacity of Dung beetles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Combining in vivo and in vitro approaches to investigate the effect of sainfoin on strongyle infection, immunity, and large intestine ecosystem of horses.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Treatment and monitoring of a high-density population of bare-nosed wombats for sarcoptic mange.PloS one · 2025Article
- Formulation and Ex Vivo Evaluation of Ivermectin Within Different Nano-Drug Delivery Vehicles for Transdermal Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Sustainable worm control in ruminants in Europe: current perspectives.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024Article
- Potential ofMetabolites · 2024Review
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The avermectins, milbemycins and spinosyns are collectively referred to as macrocyclic lactones (MLs) which comprise several classes of chemicals derived from cultures of soil micro-organisms. These compounds are extensively and increasingly used in veterinary medicine and agriculture. Due to their potential effects on non-target organisms, large amounts of information on their impact in the environment has been compiled in recent years, mainly caused by legal requirements related to their marketing authorization or registration. The main objective of this paper is to critically review the present knowledge about the acute and chronic ecotoxicological effects of MLs on organisms, mainly invertebrates, in the terrestrial and aquatic environment. Detailed information is presented on the mode-of-action as well as the ecotoxicity of the most important compounds representing the three groups of MLs. This information, based on more than 360 references, is mainly provided in nine tables, presenting the effects of abamectin, ivermectin, eprinomectin, doramectin, emamectin, moxidectin, and spinosad on individual species of terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as well as plants and algae. Since dung dwelling organisms are particularly important non-targets, as they are exposed via dung from treated animals over their whole life-cycle, the information on the effects of MLs on dung communities is compiled in an additional table. The results of this review clearly demonstrate that regarding environmental impacts many macrocyclic lactones are substances of high concern particularly with larval instars of invertebrates. Recent studies have also shown that susceptibility varies with life cycle stage and impacts can be mitigated by using MLs when these stages are not present. However information on the environmental impact of the MLs is scattered across a wide range of specialised scientific journals with research focusing mainly on ivermectin and to a lesser extent on abamectin doramectin and moxidectin. By comparison, information on compounds such as eprinomectin, emamectin and selamectin is still relatively scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.