ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2011
How we discovered fluorescent speckle microscopy.
Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micromanipulation Techniques Allowing Analysis of Morphogenetic Dynamics and Turnover of Cytoskeletal Regulators.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- The microscope makers.Nature · 2017Article
- Dynamics and organization of cortical microtubules as revealed by superresolution structured illumination microscopy.Plant physiology · 2014Article
- Quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy (QFSM) to measure actin dynamics.Current protocols in cytometry · 2012Article
- How membrane structures control T cell signaling.Frontiers in immunology · 2012Article
- Sliding of antiparallel microtubules drives bipolarization of monoastral spindles.Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescent speckle microscopy (FSM) is a method for measuring the movements and dynamic assembly of macromolecular assemblies such as cytoskeletal filaments (e.g., microtubules and actin) or focal adhesions within large arrays in living cells or in preparations in vitro. The discovery of the method depended on recognizing the importance of unexpected fluorescence images of microtubules obtained by time-lapse recording of vertebrate epithelial cells in culture. In cells that were injected with fluorescent tubulin at ~10% of the cytosol pool, microtubules typically appeared as smooth threads with a nearly constant fluorescence intensity. One day, when an unusually low concentration of fluorescent tubulin was injected into cells, the images from a sensitive cooled charge-coupled detector camera showed microtubules with an unusual "speckled" appearance-there were fluorescent dots with variable intensity and spacing along the microtubules. A first thought was that the speckles were an artifact. With further thought, we surmised that the speckles could be telling us something about stochastic association of tubulin dimers with the growing end of a microtubule. Numerous experiments confirmed the latter hypothesis. Subsequently the method we call FSM has proven to be very valuable. The speckles turned out not to be a meaningless artifact, but rather a serendipitous find.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.