Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22038482›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012

Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study.

Pascal Jean-Pierre, Kevin Fiscella, Paul C Winters, Electra Paskett, Kristen Wells, Tracy Battaglia, Patient Navigation Research Program Group

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Group Versus Individual Educational Sessions With aAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2019
    Trial
  2. Patient navigation for breast and colorectal cancer treatment: a randomized trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2012
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer-related care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a colonoscopy screening navigator program designed for Hispanic men.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pascal Jean-PierreUniversity of Miami School of Medicine and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA. PJean-Pierre@med.miami.edu
Kevin Fiscella
Paul C Winters
Electra Paskett
Kristen Wells
Tracy Battaglia
Patient Navigation Research Program Group

Funding

University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
Chicago Cancer Navigation ProjectU01CA116875 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ROSEN, STEVEN TERRY · 2005 to 2011
$4.5M
RCT of Primary Care-based Patient Navigation-ActivationU01CA116924 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FISCELLA, KEVIN ANTHONY · 2005 to 2011
$4.4M
"Patient Navigation in the SafetyNet: CONNECTeDD"U01CA116892 · NCI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI FREUND, KAREN · 2005 to 2010
$4.3M
DC City-wide Patient Navigation Research ProgramU01CA116937 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PATIERNO, STEVEN R · 2005 to 2011
$4.1M
Improving Patient Outcomes Through System NavigationU01CA116903 · NCI · DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY · PI RAICH, PETER CHRISTIAN · 2005 to 2011
$3.8M
Patient Navigation Research ProgramU01CA116885 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI DUDLEY, DONALD J · 2005 to 2010
$3.3M
Patient Navigator ProgramU01CA117281 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI ROETZHEIM, RICHARD G · 2005 to 2009
$3.1M
Northwest Tribal Cancer Navigator ProgramU01CA116925 · NCI · NORTHWEST PORTLAND AREA INDIAN HLTH BD · PI WARREN-MEARS, VICTORIA ANN · 2005 to 2009
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS 1R25CA10261801A1NCI NIH HHS 3U01CA116924-03S1NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116875NCI NIH HHS U01CA116875NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116885NCI NIH HHS U01CA116885NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116892NCI NIH HHS U01CA116892NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116903NCI NIH HHS U01CA116903NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116924NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116925NCI NIH HHS U01CA116925NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116937NCI NIH HHS U01CA116937NCI NIH HHS U01 CA117281NCI NIH HHS U01CA 117281NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient satisfaction (PS), a key measure of quality of cancer care, is a core study outcome of the multi-site National Cancer Institute-funded Patient Navigation Research Program. Despite large numbers of underserved monolingual Spanish speakers (MSS) residing in USA, there is no validated Spanish measure of PS that spans the whole spectrum of cancer-related care. The present study reports on the validation of the Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Care (PSCC) measure for Spanish (PSCC-Sp) speakers receiving diagnostic and therapeutic cancer-related care.

methodsOriginal PSCC items were professionally translated and back translated to ensure cultural appropriateness, meaningfulness, and equivalence. Then, the resulting 18-item PSCC-Sp measure was administered to 285 MSS. We evaluated latent structure and internal consistency of the PSCC-Sp using principal components analysis (PCA) and Cronbach coefficient alpha (α). We used correlation analyses to demonstrate divergence and convergence of the PSCC-Sp with a Spanish version of the Patient Satisfaction with Interpersonal Relationship with Navigator (PSN-I-Sp) measure and patients' demographics.

resultsThe PCA revealed a coherent set of items that explicates 47% of the variance in PS. Reliability assessment demonstrated that the PSCC-Sp had high internal consistency (α = 0.92). The PSCC-Sp demonstrated good face validity and convergent and divergent validities as indicated by moderate correlations with the PSN-I-Sp (p = 0.003) and nonsignificant correlations with marital status and household income (all p(s) > 0.05).

conclusionThe PSCC-Sp is a valid and reliable measure of PS and should be tested in other MSS populations.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLanguageMedically Underserved AreaMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID22038482
PMCPMC3298841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.