Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22038165›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2012

Laparoscopic rectal resection for severe endometriosis of the mid and low rectum: technique and operative results.

Giacomo Ruffo, Alberto Sartori, Stefano Crippa, Stefano Partelli, Giuliano Barugola, Alberto Manzoni, Martin Steinasserer, Luca Minelli, Massimo Falconi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giacomo RuffoDepartment of General Surgery, Ospedale Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Via Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar, VR, Italy. giacomo.ruffo@sacrocuore.it
Alberto Sartori
Stefano Crippa
Stefano Partelli
Giuliano Barugola
Alberto Manzoni
Martin Steinasserer
Luca Minelli
Massimo Falconi
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several studies have shown that laparoscopic resection is safe and feasible in bowel endometriosis, limited data are available on the specific treatment for endometriosis of the rectum. The aim of this study is to describe operative and postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic resection of the mid/low rectum for endometriosis.

methodsBetween 2002 and 2010, 750 patients (median age 33 years) underwent laparoscopic resection of the mid/low rectum for deep infiltrating endometriosis at a single institution. All operations were performed with a standardized technique by a single surgeon.

resultsMedian operative time was 255 min, and median blood loss 150 ml. Of patients, 7% required blood transfusions. Laparotomic conversion rate was 1.6%. Mechanical low and very low colorectal anastomoses were carried out in 92.5 and 7.5% of patients, respectively. Temporary ileostomy rate was 14.5%. Median length of stay was 8 days. Overall surgical morbidity was 9% with no mortality. Rates of anastomotic leak, rectovaginal fistula, and intraabdominal bleeding were 3, 2, and 1.2%. Forty patients (5.5%) required reoperation.

conclusionsLaparoscopic resection of the mid/low rectum for endometriosis can be performed safely with acceptable rates of morbidity/reoperation and with low rates of specific complications, including anastomotic leak and rectovaginal fistula. The very high surgical volume of the operating surgeon is probably one of the most important factors in order to maximize postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionEndometriosisFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRectal DiseasesRectumRecurrenceReoperationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22038165
OpenAlexW2016450597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.