ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2012
Talking about disability in prenatal genetic counseling: a report of two interactive workshops.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ableism is a value: The limits of the reciprocal-engagement model in prenatal care.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Disability, Genetic Counseling, and Medical Education: From Eugenics to Anti-Ableism.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2025Review
- Genetic counseling training program perspectives on delivering disability-related education.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Genetic Counseling, Professional Values, and Habitus: An Analysis of Disability Narratives in Textbooks.The Journal of medical humanities · 2018Article
- Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- Negotiating acceptable termination of pregnancy for non-lethal fetal anomaly: a qualitative study of professional perspectives.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Characterizing Clinical Genetic Counselors' Countertransference Experiences: an Exploratory Study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing and Disability in the NICU: Exploring Practical and Ethical Challenges.Pediatrics · 2016Article
- Attitudes of mothers of children with down syndrome towards noninvasive prenatal testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- Commentary: how individual and profession-level factors influence discussion of disability in prenatal genetic counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
- Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making.Journal of community genetics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women are commonly offered testing in pregnancy to determine the health of their baby. An important component of informed decision-making about prenatal testing is provision of relevant, accurate, meaningful information concerning the conditions that are being tested for--many of which, such as Down syndrome, are associated with a varying degree of physical and intellectual disability. A range of health professionals, including genetic counselors, may provide information and support throughout the testing process, but available data suggest that discussion of disability is frequently absent or limited. To investigate genetic counselors' perceptions of this situation and identify potential barriers to discussion we facilitated interactive workshops at the 2007 National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Education Conference (NSGC) and the 2008 European Meeting on Psychosocial Aspects of Genetics (EMPAG). Working groups identified relevant psychosocial issues and impediments to discussion (NSGC) or used a two-part scenario to promote discussion (EMPAG) and reported findings in notes and a closing plenary discussion. Inductive content analysis revealed that participants considered informed decision making to be a major reason for presenting information about disabilities in prenatal genetic counseling and endorsed the value of including information about daily life with Down syndrome and other disabilities. However, they identified three broad types of impediments to such discussion: counseling issues concerning the most appropriate manner to discuss disability under the complex circumstances of prenatal genetic counseling, less than optimal training and experience in addressing these issues, and perceived limitations in the participants' knowledge and understanding of life with disability. Our analysis of the responses from the workshop participants and additional thoughts on these issues have led us to develop recommendations for further research, training and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.