ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012
A survey on the use of gentamicin in infective endocarditis.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sonochemical Deposition of Gentamicin Nanoparticles at the PCV Tracheostomy Tube Surface Limiting Bacterial Biofilm Formation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Article
- Predictive performance of gentamicin dosing nomograms.Drug design, development and therapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
US and European guidelines recommend a daily divided gentamicin dose (3 mg/kg in two or three equally divided doses) for the treatment of infective endocarditis caused by staphylococci or enterococci, but once-daily dosing (3 mg/kg/day) is recommended for streptococcal endocarditis. However, studies have recommended the use of higher doses of gentamicin (4 or ≥5 mg/kg/day) administered once-daily. A survey was conducted in France by mailing a questionnaire to the 595 members of the French Infectious Disease Society regarding their gentamicin prescription patterns in infective endocarditis, focusing on the dosing regimen. The survey was answered by 137 physicians (23%). The proportions of physicians following guideline-based regimens were similar for each organism (30.9%, 38.8%, and 39.4% for staphylococci, enterococci, and streptococci, respectively [p=0.26]). In contrast, the proportions of physicians following literature-based regimens were significantly different for each organism (59.6%, 42.5%, and 27.7% for staphylococci, enterococci, and streptococci, respectively [p<0.001]). The number of years practicing and the type of practice (university vs. non-university hospital) did not influence the gentamicin dose or regimen. Although adherence to published guidelines for gentamicin administration in patients with infective endocarditis was poor, a large proportion of physicians who did not follow those guidelines used literature-based regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.