Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22037758›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2012

The role of enzyme replacement therapy in severe Hunter syndrome-an expert panel consensus.

Joseph Muenzer, Olaf Bodamer, Barbara Burton, Lorne Clarke, Gudrun Schulze Frenking, Roberto Giugliani, Simon Jones, Maria Verónica Muñoz Rojas, Maurizio Scarpa, Michael Beck and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. A phase I/II study of intrathecal idursulfase-IT in children with severe mucopolysaccharidosis II.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Targeting Neurological Aspects of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: Enzyme Replacement Therapy and Beyond.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differences in MPS I and MPS II Disease Manifestations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Novel therapies for mucopolysaccharidosis type III.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Joseph MuenzerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7487, USA. muenzer@med.unc.edu
Olaf Bodamer
Barbara Burton
Lorne Clarke
Gudrun Schulze Frenking
Roberto Giugliani
Simon Jones
Maria Verónica Muñoz Rojas
Maurizio Scarpa
Michael Beck
Paul Harmatz
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELurie Children's Hospital · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · USUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIntravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with idursulfase for Hunter syndrome has not been demonstrated to and is not predicted to cross the blood-brain barrier. Nearly all published experience with ERT with idursulfase has therefore been in patients without cognitive impairment (attenuated phenotype). Little formal guidance is available on the issues surrounding ERT in cognitively impaired patients with the severe phenotype. An expert panel was therefore convened to provide guidance on these issues. The clinical experience of the panel with 66 patients suggests that somatic improvements (e.g., reduction in liver volume, increased mobility, and reduction in frequency of respiratory infections) may occur in most severe patients. Cognitive benefits have not been seen. It was agreed that, in general, severe patients are candidates for at least a 6-12-month trial of ERT, excluding patients who are severely neurologically impaired, those in a vegetative state, or those who have a condition that may lead to near-term death. It is imperative that the treating physician discuss the goals of treatment, methods of assessment of response, and criteria for discontinuation of treatment with the family before ERT is initiated.

conclusionThe decision to initiate ERT in severe Hunter syndrome should be made by the physician and parents and must be based on realistic expectations of benefits and risks, with the understanding that ERT may be withdrawn in the absence of demonstrable benefits.

Indexed as

Enzyme Replacement TherapyDisease ProgressionHumansIduronate SulfataseMucopolysaccharidosis IIPhenotypePractice Guidelines as TopicTreatment OutcomeIduronate Sulfataseidursulfase

Identifiers

PMID22037758
PMCPMC3249184
OpenAlexW2012973972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.