ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2011
[Preoperative risk evaluation from the perspective of anaesthesiology].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical and technical progress together with demographic changes has led to a more complex perioperative care for patients. Accordingly, an optimal preoperative assessment in particular an adequate risk evaluation is more important than ever. A recently published joint recommendation of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Society of Surgery and the German Society of Internal Medicine aims to reduce considerable uncertainties in the preoperative risk evaluation especially with regard to"technical tests" by providing transparent and comprehensive arrangements. Consequently, routine screening will be abandoned in favour of targeted patient and operation-oriented individual risk assessment. This approach will change the preoperative risk evaluation in a scientific, organisational and economic way. The following article on preoperative risk evaluation is based on the valuable and helpful recommendation and aims to provide additional important aspects from the perspective of anaesthesiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22037717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.