Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22037345›Full record

ReviewMetabolic engineering2012

Parts plus pipes: synthetic biology approaches to metabolic engineering.

Patrick M Boyle, Pamela A Silver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolic engineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complex natural product production methods and options.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Overproduction of gentamicin B in industrial strainMetabolic engineering communications · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic Biology: Synergies, Future, and Challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Engineering and application of syntheticBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cellular factories for coenzyme QMicrobial cell factories · 2017
    Review
  20. Microbial production of vitamin BMicrobial cell factories · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick M BoyleDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pamela A Silver

Funding

Transport of Proteins In and Out of the NucleusR37GM036373 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SILVER, PAMELA A · 2003 to 2012
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM036373PHS HHS NIHGM36373-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biologists combine modular biological "parts" to create higher-order devices. Metabolic engineers construct biological "pipes" by optimizing the microbial conversion of basic substrates to desired compounds. Many scientists work at the intersection of these two philosophies, employing synthetic devices to enhance metabolic engineering efforts. These integrated approaches promise to do more than simply improve product yields; they can expand the array of products that are tractable to produce biologically. In this review, we explore the application of synthetic biology techniques to next-generation metabolic engineering challenges, as well as the emerging engineering principles for biological design.

Indexed as

Metabolic EngineeringSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID22037345
PMCPMC3293987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.