Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22037316›Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2012

A phase II evaluation of lapatinib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Agustin A Garcia, Michael W Sill, Heather A Lankes, Andrew K Godwin, Robert S Mannel, Deborah K Armstrong, Robert L Carolla, Marcia K Liepman, Nick M Spirtos, Edgar G Fischer and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integrative Kinome Profiling Identifies mTORC1/2 Inhibition as Treatment Strategy in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Agustin A GarciaUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. aagarcia@usc.edu
Michael W Sill
Heather A Lankes
Andrew K Godwin
Robert S Mannel
Deborah K Armstrong
Robert L Carolla
Marcia K Liepman
Nick M Spirtos
Edgar G Fischer
Kimberly K Leslie
Gynecologic Oncology Group · USCancer Research for the Ozarks · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Southern California · USWest Michigan Cancer Center · USWomen's Cancer Center of Nevada · US

Funding

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
Targeted Therapy for Endometrial CancerR01CA099908 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LESLIE, KIMBERLY K. · 2002 to 2023
$5.8M
Exploiting Biological Networks to Improve Clinical Treatment of Ovarian CancerR01CA140323 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GODWIN, ANDREW K. · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA 140323NCI NIH HHS CA 27469NCI NIH HHS CA 37517NCI NIH HHS CA 99908NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099908NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140323NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveActivation and dimerization of the ERBB family play a role in the pathogenesis and progression of ovarian cancer. We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity and tolerability of lapatinib in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to explore the clinical value of expression levels of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR), phosphorylated EGFR, HER-2/neu, and Ki-67, and the presence of EGFR mutations.

methodsEligible patients had recurrent or persistent EOC or primary peritoneal carcinoma, measurable disease, and up to 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for recurrent disease. Patients were treated with lapatinib 1500 mg/day. The primary endpoint of efficacy was 6-month progression free survival (PFS).

resultsTwenty-five of 28 patients were eligible and evaluable for analysis of efficacy and toxicity. Two (8.0%) were alive and progression-free at 6 months. No objective responses were observed. There were 1 grade 4 toxicity (fatigue) and few grade 3 toxicities. Associations between Ki-67 with prior platinum-free interval, PFS, and a polymorphism in EGFR were suggested.

conclusionsLapatinib has minimal activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. Ki-67 expression may be associated with prior PFS and a polymorphism in EGFR exon 20 (2361G>A, Q787Q).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDisease-Free SurvivalErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenLapatinibMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsKi-67 AntigenLapatinibQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID22037316
PMCPMC3971755
OpenAlexW2137191387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.