Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22037134›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation2012

The effect of right vagus nerve stimulation on focal cerebral ischemia: an experimental study in the rat.

Zhenghui Sun, Wesley Baker, Teruyuki Hiraki, Joel H Greenberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on cortical excitability.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2015
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Mechanism and Applications of Vagus Nerve Stimulation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. A narrative review of vagus nerve stimulation in stroke.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2024
    Review
  8. Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhenghui SunDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6063, USA.
Wesley Baker
Teruyuki Hiraki
Joel H Greenberg
University of Pennsylvania · USChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

Diffuse Optics for Acute Stroke ManagementR01NS060653 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YODH, ARJUN G. · 2008 to 2018
$5.5M
Functional activation during cerebral ischemiaR01NS057400 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GREENBERG, JOEL H · 2008 to 2010
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS060653NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057400NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on infarct size after transient and after permanent focal cerebral ischemia in rats and to test the hypothesis that VNS-induced neuroprotection is due to changes in cerebral blood flow.

methodsIschemia was produced by either temporary proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion (TMCAO) or permanent distal middle cerebral artery occlusion (PMCAO). Stimulating electrodes were implanted on the cervical part of the right vagus nerve, and electrical stimulation was initiated 30 minutes after the induction of ischemia and delivered for 30 seconds every 5 minutes for 1 hour. All the procedures were duplicated but no stimulus was delivered in control groups. Cerebral blood flow in the MCA territory was continuously monitored with laser speckle contrast imaging. A neurologic evaluation was undertaken after 24 hours of ischemia, and animals were euthanized and neuronal damage evaluated.

resultsIschemic lesion volume was smaller in VNS-treated animals in both the temporary and permanent ischemic groups (P<.01). VNS-treated animals in TMCAO had better functional scores at 24 hours as compared with control animals (P<.01), but there were no statistically significant differences in the neurobehavioral scores in PMCAO (P=.089). Cerebral blood flow changes in the MCA territory during ischemia did not differ between the VNS-treated animals and control animals in either group.

conclusionsVNS offers neuroprotection against stroke in both temporary and permanent ischemia. Although the precise mechanism of this effect remains to be determined, alterations in cerebral blood flow do not appear to play a role. VNS could readily be translated to clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaCerebral InfarctionCerebrovascular CirculationInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRegional Blood FlowVagus Nerve Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID22037134
PMCPMC3264742
OpenAlexW2024181727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.