ReviewClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2011
JAK2 inhibitors: are they the solution?
Review in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Choosing the Right Cell Line for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A computationally affordable approach for accurate prediction of the binding affinity of JAK2 inhibitors.Journal of molecular modeling · 2022Article
- Identification ofFrontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Construction of Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) Models to Predict Potency of Structurally Diversed Janus Kinase 2 Inhibitors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Combined targeting of JAK2 and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL to cure mutant JAK2-driven malignancies and overcome acquired resistance to JAK2 inhibitors.Cell reports · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The discovery of the JAK2V617F mutation in patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-negative MPN) started the era of targeted therapy for these diseases. Until now, patients had few treatment options available, which usually were restricted to hydroxyurea, interferon preparations, and chemotherapy in more aggressive cases. JAK2 inhibitors have been developed over the past 5 years, and the results of the first clinical trials with JAK2 inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis were recently published. Current research results suggest that JAK2 inhibitors have a potential to decrease disease burden and its activity, as manifested by a decrease in splenomegaly and improvement in systemic disease-related symptoms, but they do not seem to be able to eradicate the malignant clone. However, JAK2 inhibitors help patients regardless of their mutation status, because patients without JAK2V617F mutation benefit to the same extent as patients with JAK2V617F mutation. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of MPNs is needed before we can cure myelofibrosis with drug therapy. Currently, several new JAK2 inhibitors are in clinical trials for patients with myelofibrosis, and clinical trials for patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia have also started. We review recent data on JAK2 inhibitors for the management of patients with Ph-negative MPNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.