ReviewDrugs2011
Novel medications for epilepsy.
Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Compound QO-83 Alleviates Acute and Chronic Epileptic Seizures in Rodents by Modulating KCNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Targeting Kv7 Potassium Channels for Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures predict pharmacoresistance in focal cortical dysplasia-related epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2023Article
- The therapeutic effects of lacosamide on epilepsy-associated comorbidities.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Physiology and Therapeutic Potential of SK, H, and M Medium AfterHyperPolarization Ion Channels.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021Review
- Article
- Modulation of the heart's electrical properties by the anticonvulsant drug retigabine.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2017Article
- Brain tumor location influences the onset of acute psychiatric adverse events of levetiracetam therapy: an observational study.Journal of neurology · 2017Observational
- Tolerability and Safety of Commonly Used Antiepileptic Drugs in Adolescents and Adults: A Clinician's Overview.CNS drugs · 2017Review
- Efficacy of Retigabine on Acute Limbic Seizures in Adult Rats.Journal of epilepsy research · 2015Article
- Safety of lacosamide in children with refractory partial epilepsy.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2015Article
- Eslicarbazepine acetate: a review of its use as adjunctive therapy in refractory partial-onset seizures.CNS drugs · 2014Review
- Pharmacokinetic of antiepileptic drugs in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2014Review
- Clinical pharmacokinetics of new-generation antiepileptic drugs at the extremes of age: an update.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2013Review
- Modulation of K(v)7 potassium channels by a novel opener pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-7(4H)-one compound QO-58.British journal of pharmacology · 2013Article
- One man's side effect is another man's therapeutic opportunity: targeting Kv7 channels in smooth muscle disorders.British journal of pharmacology · 2013Review
- Use of lacosamide in children with refractory epilepsy.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2012Article
- New developments in the treatment of partial-onset epilepsy.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the introduction of many second-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the last 2 decades, the proportion of individuals with pharmacoresistant epilepsy has not been reduced substantially compared with the late 1960s. All currently available AEDs also have limitations in terms of adverse effects and susceptibility to be involved in clinically important drug-drug interactions. Therefore, the search for potentially more effective and better tolerated agents is continuing. This article reviews the pharmacological and clinical profile of the latest compounds to receive marketing authorization. Since the beginning of 2008, three novel AEDs, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate and retigabine (also known as ezogabine), have become commercially available in Europe, with lacosamide and retigabine also being licensed in the US. All three agents are indicated for the adjunctive treatment of focal seizures in adults. Eslicarbazepine acetate is a produg for eslicarbazepine, which acts by blocking voltage-dependent sodium channels. Lacosamide enhances the slow inactivation phase of voltage-dependent sodium channels, and retigabine potentiates neuronal M-currents by opening Kv 7.2-7.5 potassium channels. All three agents, which are well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, exhibit linear pharmacokinetics. Lacosamide is also available as an intravenous formulation intended as replacement therapy for patients temporarily unable to take oral medications. All three drugs are eliminated partly unchanged in urine and partly by biotransformation through glucuronide conjugation (eslicarbazepine, retigabine), N-acetylation (retigabine) and oxidative demethylation (lacosamide). The half-life is in the order of 8-20 hours for eslicarbazepine, 12-16 hours for lacosamide and 6-10 hours for retigabine. Based on the limited information available to date, the ability of these agents to cause pharmacokinetic drug interactions appears to be relatively modest, although eslicarbazepine can cause a significant decrease in the blood levels of ethinylestradiol, levonorgestrel and simvastatin. The approved effective dose ranges are 200-400 mg/day in two divided doses for lacosamide, 800-1200 mg/day once daily for eslicarbazepine acetate, and 600-1200 mg/day in three divided doses for retigabine. In phase III, randomized, double-blind, adjunctive therapy trials, responder rates (proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency vs baseline) at the highest approved dose were comparable for the three drugs (eslicarbazepine acetate: 37-43% vs 13-20% for placebo; lacosamide: 38-41% vs 18-26% for placebo; retigabine: 33-44% vs 16-18% for placebo). The adverse events most commonly reported with active treatment compared with placebo included dizziness, diplopia and nausea for lacosamide; dizziness, somnolence and nausea for eslicarbazepine acetate; and dizziness, somnolence and fatigue for retigabine. The role of these agents in the treatment algorithm will be increasingly defined as clinical experience accumulates. At present, their use is largely restricted to the adjunctive treatment of focal seizures, with or without secondary generalization, in adults with epilepsy who failed to achieve seizure freedom after having tried two or more first-line agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.