ArticleBMC genomics2011
Tandemly repeated DNA families in the mouse genome.
Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- A tandem repeat atlas for the genome of inbred mouse strains: A genetic variation resource.iScience · 2025Article
- Genomic and epigenomic maps of mouse centromeres and pericentromeres.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Complete genome assemblies of two mouse subspecies reveal structural diversity of telomeres and centromeres.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Large tandem repeats of grass frog (Rana temporaria) in silico and in situ.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Intact, recombinant, and spliced forms of endogenous mouse mammary tumor viruses in inbred and wild mice.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Inhibition of topoisomerase 2 catalytic activity impacts the integrity of heterochromatin and repetitive DNA and leads to interlinks between clustered repeats.Nature communications · 2024Article
- CFDP1 regulates the stability of pericentric heterochromatin thereby affecting RAN GTPase activity and mitotic spindle formation.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- DNA satellite and chromatin organization at mouse centromeres and pericentromeres.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Nuclear Distribution of the Chromatin-Remodeling Protein ATRX in Mouse Early Embryos during Normal Development and Developmental Arrest In Vitro.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Variation in the CENP-A sequence association landscape across diverse inbred mouse strains.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Pericentromeric satellite lncRNAs are induced in cancer-associated fibroblasts and regulate their functions in lung tumorigenesis.Cell death & disease · 2023Article
- T3E: a tool for characterising the epigenetic profile of transposable elements using ChIP-seq data.Mobile DNA · 2022Article
- The Cytogenetic Map of the Nile Crocodile (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Genomic Organization of Microsatellites andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Article
- AGO1 regulates pericentromeric regions in mouse embryonic stem cells.Life science alliance · 2022Article
- Tandem Repeat Diversity in Two Closely Related Hamster Species-The Chinese Hamster (Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Single-Cell Mononucleotide Microsatellite Analysis Reveals Differential Insertion-Deletion Dynamics in Mouse T Cells.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Copy number evolution in simple and complex tandem repeats across the C57BL/6 and C57BL/10 inbred mouse lines.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFunctional and morphological studies of tandem DNA repeats, that combine high portion of most genomes, are mostly limited due to the incomplete characterization of these genome elements. We report here a genome wide analysis of the large tandem repeats (TR) found in the mouse genome assemblies.
resultsUsing a bioinformatics approach, we identified large TR with array size more than 3 kb in two mouse whole genome shotgun (WGS) assemblies. Large TR were classified based on sequence similarity, chromosome position, monomer length, array variability, and GC content; we identified four superfamilies, eight families, and 62 subfamilies - including 60 not previously described. 1) The superfamily of centromeric minor satellite is only found in the unassembled part of the reference genome. 2) The pericentromeric major satellite is the most abundant superfamily and reveals high order repeat structure. 3) Transposable elements related superfamily contains two families. 4) The superfamily of heterogeneous tandem repeats includes four families. One family is found only in the WGS, while two families represent tandem repeats with either single or multi locus location. Despite multi locus location, TRPC-21A-MM is placed into a separated family due to its abundance, strictly pericentromeric location, and resemblance to big human satellites. To confirm our data, we next performed in situ hybridization with three repeats from distinct families. TRPC-21A-MM probe hybridized to chromosomes 3 and 17, multi locus TR-22A-MM probe hybridized to ten chromosomes, and single locus TR-54B-MM probe hybridized with the long loops that emerge from chromosome ends. In addition to in silico predicted several extra-chromosomes were positive for TR by in situ analysis, potentially indicating inaccurate genome assembly of the heterochromatic genome regions.
conclusionsChromosome-specific TR had been predicted for mouse but no reliable cytogenetic probes were available before. We report new analysis that identified in silico and confirmed in situ 3/17 chromosome-specific probe TRPC-21-MM. Thus, the new classification had proven to be useful tool for continuation of genome study, while annotated TR can be the valuable source of cytogenetic probes for chromosome recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.