ArticleBMC systems biology2011
Inference of complex biological networks: distinguishability issues and optimization-based solutions.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Prediction to Creation: Generative Plant Design.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Distilling identifiable and interpretable dynamic models from biological data.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Improving dynamic predictions with ensembles of observable models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- High-performance single-cell gene regulatory network inference at scale: the Inferelator 3.0.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- DeltaNeTS+: elucidating the mechanism of drugs and diseases using gene expression and transcriptional regulatory networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Multi-model and network inference based on ensemble estimates: avoiding the madness of crowds.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Competition in the chaperone-client network subordinates cell-cycle entry to growth and stress.Life science alliance · 2019Article
- SINCERITIES: inferring gene regulatory networks from time-stamped single cell transcriptional expression profiles.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Fundamental limitations of network reconstruction from temporal data.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Article
- Inferring gene targets of drugs and chemical compounds from gene expression profiles.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Optimal design of gene knockout experiments for gene regulatory network inference.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- DTW-MIC Coexpression Networks from Time-Course Data.PloS one · 2016Article
- Reverse engineering of logic-based differential equation models using a mixed-integer dynamic optimization approach.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- BioPreDyn-bench: a suite of benchmark problems for dynamic modelling in systems biology.BMC systems biology · 2015Article
- Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- A null model for Pearson coexpression networks.PloS one · 2015Article
- Computational strategies for a system-level understanding of metabolism.Metabolites · 2014Review
- Parameter estimation of dynamic biological network models using integrated fluxes.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Reverse engineering and identification in systems biology: strategies, perspectives and challenges.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014Review
- Cutting the wires: modularization of cellular networks for experimental design.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe inference of biological networks from high-throughput data has received huge attention during the last decade and can be considered an important problem class in systems biology. However, it has been recognized that reliable network inference remains an unsolved problem. Most authors have identified lack of data and deficiencies in the inference algorithms as the main reasons for this situation.
resultsWe claim that another major difficulty for solving these inference problems is the frequent lack of uniqueness of many of these networks, especially when prior assumptions have not been taken properly into account. Our contributions aid the distinguishability analysis of chemical reaction network (CRN) models with mass action dynamics. The novel methods are based on linear programming (LP), therefore they allow the efficient analysis of CRNs containing several hundred complexes and reactions. Using these new tools and also previously published ones to obtain the network structure of biological systems from the literature, we find that, often, a unique topology cannot be determined, even if the structure of the corresponding mathematical model is assumed to be known and all dynamical variables are measurable. In other words, certain mechanisms may remain undetected (or they are falsely detected) while the inferred model is fully consistent with the measured data. It is also shown that sparsity enforcing approaches for determining 'true' reaction structures are generally not enough without additional prior information.
conclusionsThe inference of biological networks can be an extremely challenging problem even in the utopian case of perfect experimental information. Unfortunately, the practical situation is often more complex than that, since the measurements are typically incomplete, noisy and sometimes dynamically not rich enough, introducing further obstacles to the structure/parameter estimation process. In this paper, we show how the structural uniqueness and identifiability of the models can be guaranteed by carefully adding extra constraints, and that these important properties can be checked through appropriate computation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.