Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22034828›Full record

ArticleBioconjugate chemistry2011

Multi-path quenchers: efficient quenching of common fluorophores.

Pete Crisalli, Eric T Kool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A "Quenchergenic" Chemoselective Protein Labeling Strategy.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pete CrisalliDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5080, USA.
Eric T Kool

Funding

Templated Chemistry for RNA AnalysisR01GM068122 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KOOL, ERIC T. · 2003 to 2016
$3.5M
POLYFLUOROPHORES ASSEMBLED ON A DNA SCAFFOLDR01GM067201 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KOOL, ERIC T. · 2003 to 2011
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM067201NIGMS NIH HHS GM068122NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067201NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence quenching groups are widely employed in biological detection, sensing, and imaging. To date, a relatively small number of such groups are in common use. Perhaps the most commonly used quencher, dabcyl, has limited efficiency with a broad range of fluorophores. Here, we describe a molecular approach to improve the efficiency of quenchers by increasing their electronic complexity. Multi-Path Quenchers (MPQ) are designed to have multiple donor or acceptor groups in their structure, allowing for a multiplicity of conjugation pathways of varied length. This has the effect of broadening the absorption spectrum, which in turn can increase quenching efficiency and versatility. Six such MPQ derivatives are synthesized and tested for quenching efficiency in a DNA hybridization context. Duplexes placing quenchers and fluorophores within contact distance or beyond this distance are used to measure quenching via contact or FRET mechanisms. Results show that several of the quenchers are considerably more efficient than dabcyl at quenching a wider range of common fluorophores, and two quench fluorescein and TAMRA as well as or better than a Black Hole Quencher.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNAFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorescent DyesMolecular StructureNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularSpectrometry, FluorescenceDNAFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID22034828
PMCPMC3226780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.