Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22034141›Full record

ArticleDialogues in clinical neuroscience2003

The discovery of Alzheimer's disease.

Hanns Hippius, Gabriele Neundörfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Pharmacological Characterization ofRecent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2026
    Article
  10. Genomic and proteomic conversion of brain ischemia to Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: Past, present, and future.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanns HippiusPsychiatrische Klinik der LMU, Munich, Germany.
Gabriele Neundörfer
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On November 3, 1906, a clinical psychiatrist and neuroanatomist, Alois Alzheimer, reported "A peculiar severe disease process of the cerebral cortex" to the 37th Meeting of South-West German Psychiatrists in Tubingen, He described a 50-year-old woman whom he had followed from her admission for paranoia, progressive sleep and memory disturbance, aggression, and confusion, until her death 5 years later. His report noted distinctive plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain histology. It excited little interest despite an enthusiastic response from Kraepelin, who promptly included "Alzheimer's disease" in the 8th edition of his text Psychiatrie in 1910. Alzheimer published three further cases in 1909 and a "plaque-only" variant in 1911, which reexamination of the original specimens in 1993 showed to be a different stage of the same process, Alzheimer died in 1915, aged 51, soon after gaining the chair of psychiatry in Breslau, and long before his name became a household word.

Indexed as

Alois AlzheimerAlzheimer's diseasecase of Auguste D.case of Josef RGerman psychiatryhistory

Identifiers

PMID22034141
PMCPMC3181715
OpenAlexW1543848190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.