Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22033924›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

Molecular determinants of ivermectin sensitivity at the glycine receptor chloride channel.

Timothy Lynagh, Timothy I Webb, Christine L Dixon, Brett A Cromer, Joseph W Lynch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modulation of P2XPhysiological reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Potential therapeutic effects of Ivermectin in COVID-19.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Chemogenetics as a neuromodulatory approach to treating neuropsychiatric diseases and disorders.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy LynaghQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072.
Timothy I WebbQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072.
Christine L DixonQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072.
Brett A CromerHealth Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 2476, Australia.
Joseph W LynchQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072; School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072. Electronic address: j.lynch@uq.edu.au.
University of Queensland · AURMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ivermectin is an anthelmintic drug that works by activating glutamate-gated chloride channel receptors (GluClRs) in nematode parasites. GluClRs belong to the Cys-loop receptor family that also includes glycine receptor (GlyR) chloride channels. GluClRs and A288G mutant GlyRs are both activated by low nanomolar ivermectin concentrations. The crystal structure of the Caenorhabditis elegans α GluClR complexed with ivermectin has recently been published. Here, we probed ivermectin sensitivity determinants on the α1 GlyR using site-directed mutagenesis and electrophysiology. Based on a mutagenesis screen of transmembrane residues, we identified Ala288 and Pro230 as crucial sensitivity determinants. A comparison of the actions of selamectin and ivermectin suggested the benzofuran C05-OH was required for high efficacy. When taken together with docking simulations, these results supported a GlyR ivermectin binding orientation similar to that seen in the GluClR crystal structure. However, whereas the crystal structure shows that ivermectin interacts with the α GluClR via H-bonds with Leu218, Ser260, and Thr285 (α GluClR numbering), our data indicate that H-bonds with residues homologous to Ser260 and Thr285 are not important for high ivermectin sensitivity or direct agonist efficacy in A288G α1 GlyRs or three other GluClRs. Our data also suggest that van der Waals interactions between the ivermectin disaccharide and GlyR M2-M3 loop residues are unimportant for high ivermectin sensitivity. Thus, although our results corroborate the ivermectin binding orientation as revealed by the crystal structure, they demonstrate that some of the binding interactions revealed by this structure do not pertain to other highly ivermectin-sensitive Cys-loop receptors.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiparasitic AgentsBenzofuransCaenorhabditis elegansChloride ChannelsCrystallography, X-RayCysteineElectrophysiologyGlycineHydrogen BondingIvermectinMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationReceptors, GlycineAntiparasitic AgentsbenzofuranBenzofuransChloride ChannelsCysteineglutamate-gated chloride channelsGlycineIvermectinReceptors, Glycineselamectin

Identifiers

PMID22033924
PMCPMC3243547
OpenAlexW2009889590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.