Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22033542›Full record

Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2011

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation does not offer any advantage over suture ligation of grade 3 symptomatic hemorrhoids.

P J Gupta, S Kalaskar, S Taori, P S Heda

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03298997 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between the Ligation and Hemorrhoidopexy Technique and the Conventional Ligation of Hemorrhoidal Arteries Using Ultrasound: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLarissa University HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsHemorrhoidsArmsLigation and Hemorrhoidopexy, Ultrasound Guided Ligation of Hemorrhoidal Arteries
NCT05782010 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

SCI-Pex, a Multi-center, Prospective, Non-controlled Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of PexyEazy®, a Device for Treatment of Hemorrhoids

TypeinterventionalSponsorDeveloperation ABRan2023 to 2026Enrolled35ConditionsHemorrhoids, Hemorrhoids, Internal, Suture, Complications, Infection or InflammationArmsPexyEazy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation: Is Doppler guidance useful? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P J GuptaFine Morning Hospital and Research Center, Gupta Nursing Home, Laxminagar, Nagpur 440022, India. drpjg@yahoo.co.in
S Kalaskar
S Taori
P S Heda
Saroj Gupta Cancer Centre & Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDoppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal vessels is being proposed as a treatment of grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids. Many researchers are coupling this procedure with mucopexy or lifting of hemorrhoids to control the prolapse more effectively. The present study was conducted in patients with 3rd-degree hemorrhoids to determine the usefulness of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation compared to mucopexy of prolapsing hemorrhoids and to compare it with mere mucopexy of the hemorrhoids. MATERIALS AND

methodsA double-blind, randomized controlled study was conducted on 48 consecutive patients with grade III hemorrhoids requiring surgery. The patients were randomized into two groups. Half of them were treated with ligation and mucopexy [SL], while the remaining patients underwent a Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation followed by ligation and mucopexy [DSL]. The patients were examined by a blinded independent observer at 2, 4, and 6 weeks and at the end of 1 year after the operation to evaluate postoperative pain scores, amount of analgesics consumed, and complications encountered. The observer also assessed recurrence of hemorrhoids after 1 year.

resultsOperative time was significantly longer in the DSL group (31 min vs. 9 min P < 0.003). The postoperative pain score was significantly higher in the Doppler group [4.4 vs. 2.2, P < 0.002 (visual analogue scale)]. The mean total analgesic dose and duration of pain control using analgesics were greater and longer for the Doppler group than for the SL group (17 vs. 11 tablets, and 13 days vs. 9 days, respectively; P < 0. 01). Complications were similar in both the groups. At 1-year follow-up, the recurrence of hemorrhoids was not statistically significant in either group (4 patients in SL group and 3 patients in DSL group; P < 0.93).

conclusionsSuture ligation of hemorrhoids is a simple, cost-effective, and convenient modality for treating grade 3 hemorrhoids. Doppler assistance in ligating the hemorrhoidal vessels prior to hemorrhoidal mucopexy offers no advantage and is a time-consuming procedure.

Indexed as

SuturesAdultArteriesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemorrhoidsHumansLigationMaleMiddle AgedRectumTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorVascular Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID22033542
OpenAlexW2015588163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.