Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22033488›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2011

From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips.

Dongeun Huh, Geraldine A Hamilton, Donald E Ingber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 703 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
703citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

703 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Three dimensional (3D) gingival models in periodontal research: a systematic review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Three-dimensional microelectrode arrays forBiomedical engineering letters · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Apoptosis execution is spatially regulated.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

643 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongeun HuhWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Geraldine A Hamilton
Donald E Ingber

Funding

Nano-Scale Tools for Use in Cell BiologyR01ES016665 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI WHITESIDES, GEORGE M · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016665NIEHS NIH HHS R01-ES65
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D cell-culture models have recently garnered great attention because they often promote levels of cell differentiation and tissue organization not possible in conventional 2D culture systems. We review new advances in 3D culture that leverage microfabrication technologies from the microchip industry and microfluidics approaches to create cell-culture microenvironments that both support tissue differentiation and recapitulate the tissue-tissue interfaces, spatiotemporal chemical gradients, and mechanical microenvironments of living organs. These 'organs-on-chips' permit the study of human physiology in an organ-specific context, enable development of novel in vitro disease models, and could potentially serve as replacements for animals used in drug development and toxin testing.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesAnimalsBiomimetic MaterialsHumansMembranes, ArtificialMicrofluidicsModels, BiologicalMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID22033488
PMCPMC4386065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.