Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22033484›Full record

ArticleDialogues in clinical neuroscience2001

Toward a modern search for schizophrenia genes.

M Leboyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M LeboyerService de psychiatrie adulte, CHU Albert Chenevier et Henri Mondor, Université Paris XII, Créteil, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic epidemiology has provided consistent evidence that schizophrenia has a genetic component It is now clear that this genetic component is complex and polygenic, with several genes interacting in epistasis. Although molecular studies have failed to identify any DNA variant that clearly contributes to vulnerability to schizophrenia, several regions have been implicated by linkage studies. To overcome the difficulties in the search for schizophrenia genes, it is necessary (i) to use methods of analysis that are appropriate for complex multifactorial disorders; (ii) to gather large enough clinical samples; and (iii) in the absence of genetic validity of the diagnostic classification currently used, to apply new strategies in order to better define the affected phenotypes. For this purpose, we describe here two strategies: (i) the candidate symptom approach, which concerns affected subjects and uses proband characteristics as the affected phenotype, such as age at onset, severity, and negative/positive symptoms; and (ii) the endophenotypic approach, which concerns unaffected relatives and has already provided positive findings with phenotypes, such as P50 inhibitory gating or eye-movement dysfunctions.

Indexed as

associationcandidate symptomendophenotypegeneticslinkageschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID22033484
PMCPMC3181646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.