Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22033134›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2011

Effects of phase cancellation and receiver aperture size on broadband ultrasonic attenuation for trabecular bone in vitro.

Jiqi Cheng, Frederick Serra-Hsu, Yuan Tian, Wei Lin, Yi-Xian Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Fragility fracture discriminative ability of radius quantitative ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiqi ChengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Frederick Serra-Hsu
Yuan Tian
Wei Lin
Yi-Xian Qin

Funding

Functional Fluid Flow Regulated Bone RegenerationR01AR061821 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI QIN, YI-XIAN · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Role of Musculo-Dynamics in Bone Fluid Flow, Circulation and AdaptationR01AR052379 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI QIN, YI-XIAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
Bone Fluid Flow and its Regulatory Role in AdaptationR01AR049286 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI QIN, YI-XIAN · 2003 to 2006
$1.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR49286NIAMS NIH HHS AR52379NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR049286NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052379NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR061821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase cancellation in ultrasound due to large receiver size has been proposed as a contributing factor to the inaccuracy of estimating broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), which is used to characterize bone quality. Transducers with aperture size ranging from 2 to 5 mm have been used in previous attempts to study the effect of phase cancellation. However, these receivers themselves are susceptible to phase cancellation because aperture size is close to one center wavelength (about 3 mm at 500 KHz in water). This study uses an ultra small receiver (aperture size: 0.2 mm) in conjunction with a newly developed two-dimensional (2-D) synthetic array system to investigate the effects of phase cancellation and receiver aperture size on BUA estimations of bone tissue. In vitro ultrasound measurements were conducted on 54 trabecular bone samples (harvested from sheep femurs) in a confocal configuration with a focused transmitter and synthesized focused receivers of different aperture sizes. Phase sensitive (PS) and phase insensitive (PI) detections were performed. The results show that phase cancellation does have a significant effect on BUA. The normalized BUA (nBUA) with PS is 8.1% higher than PI nBUA while PI BUA is well correlated with PS BUA. Receiver aperture size also influences the BUA reading for both PI and PS detection and smaller receiver aperture tends to result in higher BUA readings. The results also indicate that the receiver aperture size used in the confocal configuration with PI detection should at least equal the aperture of the transmitter to capture most of the energy redistributed by the interference and diffraction from the trabecular bone.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsAnimalsEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemurImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySheepTransducersUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID22033134
PMCPMC3223273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.