Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22031947›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2012

Characterization, mapping, and distribution of the two XMRV parental proviruses.

Oya Cingöz, Tobias Paprotka, Krista A Delviks-Frankenberry, Sheryl Wildt, Wei-Shau Hu, Vinay K Pathak, John M Coffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Broad-scale phylogenomics provides insights into retrovirus-host evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oya CingözDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Genetics Program, Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tobias Paprotka
Krista A Delviks-Frankenberry
Sheryl Wildt
Wei-Shau Hu
Vinay K Pathak
John M Coffin

Funding

Viral Replication and Interactions with Host FactorsZIABC011436 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PATHAK, VINAY K. · 2012 to 2025
$12.2M
Retrovirus EvolutionR37CA089441 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI COFFIN, JOHN M · 2006 to 2015
$6.5M
Understanding Retroviral Reverse Transcription, Recombination, and ReplicationZIABC010504 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HU, WEI-SHAU · 2009 to 2025
$5.3M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS R37 CA 089441NCI NIH HHS R37 CA089441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) was previously reported to be associated with human prostate cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome. Our groups recently showed that XMRV was created through recombination between two endogenous murine retroviruses, PreXMRV-1 and PreXMRV-2, during the passaging of a prostate tumor xenograft in nude mice. Here, multiple approaches that led to the identification of PreXMRV-2, as well as the distribution of both parental proviruses among different mouse species, are described. The chromosomal loci of both proviruses were determined in the mouse genome, and integration site information was used to analyze the distribution of both proviruses in 48 laboratory mouse strains and 46 wild-derived strains. The strain distributions of PreXMRV-1 and PreXMRV-2 are quite different, the former being found predominantly in Asian mice and the latter in European mice, making it unlikely that the two XMRV ancestors could have recombined independently in the wild to generate an infectious virus. XMRV was not present in any of the mouse strains tested, and among the wild-derived mouse strains analyzed, not a single mouse carried both parental proviruses. Interestingly, PreXMRV-1 and PreXMRV-2 were found together in three laboratory strains, Hsd nude, NU/NU, and C57BR/cd, consistent with previous data that the recombination event that led to the generation of XMRV could have occurred only in the laboratory. The three laboratory strains carried the Xpr1(n) receptor variant nonpermissive to XMRV and xenotropic murine leukemia virus (X-MLV) infection, suggesting that the xenografted human tumor cells were required for the resulting XMRV recombinant to infect and propagate.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMolecular Sequence DataProvirusesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, VirusRecombination, GeneticRetroviridae InfectionsReceptors, VirusXenotropic and Polytropic Retrovirus ReceptorXPR1 protein, humanXpr1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22031947
PMCPMC3255884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.