Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22031182›Full record

ArticleMucosal immunology2012

Comparison of systemic and mucosal vaccination: impact on intravenous and rectal SIV challenge.

D L Bolton, K Song, R L Wilson, P A Kozlowski, G D Tomaras, B F Keele, R V Lovingood, S Rao, M Roederer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mucosal immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Env-independent protection of intrarectal SIV challenge by vaccine induction of Gag/Vif-specific CD8Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Respiratory nanoparticle-based vaccines and challenges associated with animal models and translation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D L BoltonImmunoTechnology Section, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
K Song
R L Wilson
P A Kozlowski
G D Tomaras
B F Keele
R V Lovingood
S Rao
M Roederer
Duke University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

Development of Aersolized VaccinesZIAAI005090 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI ROEDERER, MARIO · 2009 to 2016
$4.4M
T Cell Dynamics In SIV-infected MacaquesZIAAI005019 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI ROEDERER, MARIO · 2009 to 2014
$3.5M
NASAL DNA/PROTEIN VACCINE FOR ANTI-HIV ANTIBODY AND CTLR01AI058896 · NIAID · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI KOZLOWSKI, PAMELA ANN · 2004 to 2009
$2.6M
Intramural NIH HHSNIAID NIH HHS AI058896NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058896PHS HHS HHSN266200400088C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal tissues are the primary route of transmission for most respiratory and sexually transmitted diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus. We aimed to generate strong mucosal immune responses to simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in rhesus macaques by targeting recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 (rAd5) to the lung. The immunogenicity and efficacy of aerosol (AE) vaccination was compared with intramuscular (IM) delivery in either an intravenous (IV) or intrarectal (IR) SIV(mac251) challenge model. Aerosolized rAd5 induced strong cellular responses in the lung and systemic humoral responses equivalent to IM. Strikingly, all immunization groups controlled acute viremia in the IV challenge model by 1-2 logs. By contrast, after IR challenge, only peak viremia was reduced by immunization, with no significant effect on SIV infection acquisition rate or mucosal CD4(+) T-cell preservation. Improved disease outcome was associated with pre-challenge cellular and humoral responses, while post-challenge T-cell responses were highly correlated with viremia control. The similar outcomes achieved by systemic and airway mucosal immunization support AE delivery as a safe, effective, and less invasive alternative to parenteral vaccination.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdministration, InhalationAdministration, RectalAnimalsAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesDisease Models, AnimalHumansInjections, IntravenousLungMacaca mulattaMucous MembranePeptide FragmentsSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusVaccinationAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesPeptide FragmentsSIV(mac) proteinase

Identifiers

PMID22031182
PMCPMC3732474
OpenAlexW2025646249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.