Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22030672›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2012

In glucose-limited continuous culture the minimum substrate concentration for growth, Smin, is crucial in the competition between the enterobacterium Escherichia coli and Chelatobacter heintzii, an environmentally abundant bacterium.

Hans Peter Füchslin, Christian Schneider, Thomas Egli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Growth of bacteria in 3-d colonies.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hans Peter FüchslinDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Christian Schneider
Thomas Egli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The competition for glucose between Escherichia coli ML30, a typical copiotrophic enterobacterium and Chelatobacter heintzii ATCC29600, an environmentally successful strain, was studied in a carbon-limited culture at low dilution rates. First, as a base for modelling, the kinetic parameters μ(max) and K(s) were determined for growth with glucose. For both strains, μ(max) was determined in batch culture after different precultivation conditions. In the case of C. heintzii, μ(max) was virtually independent of precultivation conditions. When inoculated into a glucose-excess batch culture medium from a glucose-limited chemostat run at a dilution rate of 0.075 h(-1) C. heintzii grew immediately with a μ(max) of 0.17 ± 0.03 h(-1). After five transfers in batch culture, μ(max) had increased only slightly to 0.18 ± 0.03 h(-1). A different pattern was observed in the case of E. coli. Inoculated from a glucose-limited chemostat at D = 0.075 h(-1) into glucose-excess batch medium E. coli grew only after an acceleration phase of ~3.5 h with a μ(max) of 0.52 h(-1). After 120 generations and several transfers into fresh medium, μ(max) had increased to 0.80 ± 0.03 h(-1). For long-term adapted chemostat-cultivated cells, a K(s) for glucose of 15 μg l(-1) for C. heintzii, and of 35 μg l(-1) for E. coli, respectively, was determined in (14)C-labelled glucose uptake experiments. In competition experiments, the population dynamics of the mixed culture was determined using specific surface antibodies against C. heintzii and a specific 16S rRNA probe for E. coli. C. heintzii outcompeted E. coli in glucose-limited continuous culture at the low dilution rates of 0.05 and 0.075 h(-1). Using the determined pure culture parameter values for K(s) and μ(max), it was only possible to simulate the population dynamics during competition with an extended form of the Monod model, which includes a finite substrate concentration at zero growth rate (s(min)). The values estimated for s(min) were dependent on growth rate; at D = 0.05 h(-1), it was 12.6 and 0 μg l(-1) for E. coli and C. heintzii, respectively. To fit the data at D=0.075 h(-1), s(min) for E. coli had to be raised to 34.9 μg l(-1) whereas s(min) for C. heintzii remained zero. The results of the mathematical simulation suggest that it is not so much the higher K(s) value, which is responsible for the unsuccessful competition of E. coli at low residual glucose concentration, but rather the existence of a significant s(min).

Indexed as

Culture MediaEscherichia coliGlucoseKineticsLactosePhyllobacteriaceaeCulture MediaGlucoseLactose

Identifiers

PMID22030672
PMCPMC3309354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.