ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2011
High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serasynth Mesh BR Pocket in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant and Tissue-expander Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Single-center Analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Article
- Research Progress on Extracellular Matrix-Based Composite Materials in Antibacterial Field.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Article
- Comparing Complications of Biologic and Synthetic Mesh in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Archives of plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Polydioxanone Internal Support Matrix: A Rationale for Prophylactic Internal Bra Support in Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
- "Never Trust the Skin": A Rationale for Using Polydioxanone Internal Support Matrix to Minimize Scarring in Primary Mastopexy-Augmentation-An Observational Study.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
- [Reconstruction of oncological defects of the perianal region].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Article
- Prophylactic antibiotic use in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021Article
- Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2016Review
- Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.Gland surgery · 2016Review
- Bacterial adhesion to biological versus polymer prosthetic materials used in abdominal wall defect repair: do these meshes show any differences in vitro?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2015Article
- Histologic, Molecular, and Clinical Evaluation of Explanted Breast Prostheses, Capsules, and Acellular Dermal Matrices for Bacteria.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2015Article
- Bacteria repelling poly(methylmethacrylate-Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2014Article
- An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere has been increasing use of synthetic and acellular dermal matrix materials in surgery, ranging from breast reconstruction to hernia repairs. There is a paucity of data on how acellular dermal matrix compares with other surgical materials as a substrate for bacterial adhesion, the first step in formation biofilm, which occurs in prosthetic wound infections. The authors have designed a high-throughput assay to evaluate Staphylococcus aureus adherence on various synthetic and biologically derived materials.
methodsClinical isolates of S. aureus (strains SC-1 and UAMS-1) were cultured with different materials, and bacterial adherence was measured using a resazurin cell vitality assay. Four materials that are commonly used in surgery were evaluated: Prolene mesh, Vicryl mesh, and two different acellular dermal matrix preparations (AlloDerm and FlexHD). The authors were able to develop a high-throughput and reliable assay for quantifying bacterial adhesion on synthetic and biologically derived materials.
resultsThe resazurin vitality assay can be reliably used to quantify bacterial adherence to acellular dermal matrix material and synthetic material. S. aureus strains SC-1 and UAMS-1 both adhered better to acellular dermal matrix materials (AlloDerm versus FlexHD) than to the synthetic material Prolene. S. aureus also adhered better to Vicryl than to Prolene. Strain UAMS-1 adhered better to Vicryl and acellular dermal matrix materials than did strain SC-1.
conclusionsThe results show that S. aureus adheres more readily to acellular dermal matrix material than to synthetic material. The resazurin assay provides a standard method for evaluating surgical materials with regard to bacterial adherence and potential propensity for biofilm development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.