Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22030489›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2011

High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials.

Theodore T Nyame, Katherine P Lemon, Roberto Kolter, Eric C Liao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Reconstruction of oncological defects of the perianal region].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bacteria repelling poly(methylmethacrylate-Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Theodore T NyameBoston, Mass. From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; the Center for Regenerative Medicine, Harvard Stem Cell Institute; the Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School; and the Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School.
Katherine P Lemon
Roberto Kolter
Eric C Liao
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard Stem Cell Institute · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF BIOFILM FORMATIONR01GM058213 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI RUDNER, DAVID Z · 1998 to 2017
$7.5M
Biofilm Formation by Listeria monocytogenesK08AI070561 · NIAID · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEMON, KATHERINE PAIGE · 2006 to 2008
$371k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI070561NIGMS NIH HHS GM58213NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been increasing use of synthetic and acellular dermal matrix materials in surgery, ranging from breast reconstruction to hernia repairs. There is a paucity of data on how acellular dermal matrix compares with other surgical materials as a substrate for bacterial adhesion, the first step in formation biofilm, which occurs in prosthetic wound infections. The authors have designed a high-throughput assay to evaluate Staphylococcus aureus adherence on various synthetic and biologically derived materials.

methodsClinical isolates of S. aureus (strains SC-1 and UAMS-1) were cultured with different materials, and bacterial adherence was measured using a resazurin cell vitality assay. Four materials that are commonly used in surgery were evaluated: Prolene mesh, Vicryl mesh, and two different acellular dermal matrix preparations (AlloDerm and FlexHD). The authors were able to develop a high-throughput and reliable assay for quantifying bacterial adhesion on synthetic and biologically derived materials.

resultsThe resazurin vitality assay can be reliably used to quantify bacterial adherence to acellular dermal matrix material and synthetic material. S. aureus strains SC-1 and UAMS-1 both adhered better to acellular dermal matrix materials (AlloDerm versus FlexHD) than to the synthetic material Prolene. S. aureus also adhered better to Vicryl than to Prolene. Strain UAMS-1 adhered better to Vicryl and acellular dermal matrix materials than did strain SC-1.

conclusionsThe results show that S. aureus adheres more readily to acellular dermal matrix material than to synthetic material. The resazurin assay provides a standard method for evaluating surgical materials with regard to bacterial adherence and potential propensity for biofilm development.

Indexed as

CollagenSurgical MeshBacterial AdhesionBiocompatible MaterialsCulture MediaHumansMaterials TestingProstheses and ImplantsSkin, ArtificialStaphylococcus aureusTissue EngineeringAllodermBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID22030489
PMCPMC3766523
OpenAlexW1977764582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.