Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22028911›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Five-year prognosis in an incident cohort of people presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

Colin R Simpson, Brian S Buckley, David J McLernon, Aziz Sheikh, Andrew Murphy, Philip C Hannaford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Colin R SimpsoneHealth Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Teviot Place, Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. c.simpson@ed.ac.uk
Brian S Buckley
David J McLernon
Aziz Sheikh
Andrew Murphy
Philip C Hannaford
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity of Aberdeen · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office PDF/08/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing an AMI, it is important for patients and their physicians to appreciate the subsequent risk of death, and the potential benefits of invasive cardiac procedures and secondary preventive therapy. Studies, to-date, have focused largely on high-risk populations. We wished to determine the risk of death in a population-derived cohort of 2,887 patients after a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

methodsLogistic regression and survival analysis were conducted to investigate the effect of different baseline characteristics, pharmacological therapies and revascularization procedures on coronary heart disease (CHD) and all-cause mortality outcomes.

resultsWithin five years 44.4% of patients died (27.1% short-term [<30 days] and 23.7% longer-term [≥30 days]). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (Adjusted Hazards Ratio (AHR) = 0.49, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.26-0.93), β-blockers (AHR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.46-0.74) and statins (AHR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.47-0.77) were all associated with significant reductions in longer-term CHD-related mortality. However, not all patients received secondary preventive therapy (8.7%). Diabetes (AHR = 1.83, 95%CI 1.43-2.34), stroke (AHR = 1.73, 95%CI 1.35-2.22), heart failure (AHR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.28-2.22), smoking (AHR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.18-2.51) and obesity (>30 kg/m2; AHR = 1.39, 95%CI 1.01-1.90) increased the risk of longer-term mortality independent of other risk factors.

conclusionsIt is encouraging that the coronary procedure PTCA and pharmacological secondary prevention therapies were found to be strongly associated with an important reduced risk of subsequent death, although not all patients received these interventions. Smoking, being obese and having cardiovascular related disease at baseline were also associated with an increased likelihood of longer-term mortality, independent of other baseline characteristics. Thus, the provision of smoking cessation, advice on diet (for obese patients) and optimal treatment is likely to be crucial for reducing mortality in all patients after AMI.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesCoronary DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationPrognosisSecondary PreventionSmoking

Identifiers

PMID22028911
PMCPMC3197664
OpenAlexW2107158992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.