ArticlePloS one2011
Genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population-resourced species-specific InDel markers for identifying putative interspecific hybrids between Populus euphratica and Populus pruinosa.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
- Genetic structure and local adaptation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Coalescent-based species delimitation in North American pinyon pines using low-copy nuclear genes and plastomes.American journal of botany · 2022Article
- Phylogeography Reveals Geographic and Environmental Factors Driving Genetic Differentiation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Demographic history and genetic differentiation of an endemic and endangered Ulmus lamellosa (Ulmus).BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Change in Spatial Distribution Patterns and Regeneration of Populus euphratica under Different Surface Soil Salinity Conditions.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Seed Germination Under Salt Stress in Two Desert Sister Species (Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Phylogeographic patterns of the desert poplar in Northwest China shaped by both geology and climatic oscillations.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
- Strong population bottleneck and repeated demographic expansions of Populus adenopoda (Salicaceae) in subtropical China.Annals of botany · 2018Article
- Species Delimitation and Lineage Separation History of a Species Complex of Aspens in China.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Distinct patterns of natural selection in NaEcology and evolution · 2017Article
- De novo transcriptome assembly, development of EST-SSR markers and population genetic analyses for the desert biomass willow, Salix psammophila.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Phylogeography of East Asian Lespedeza buergeri (Fabaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence variations.Journal of plant research · 2016Article
- Application of Microsatellite Loci for Molecular Identification of Elite Genotypes, Analysis of Clonality, and Genetic Diversity in Aspen Populus tremula L. (Salicaceae).International journal of plant genomics · 2015Article
- Transcriptome dynamics of a desert poplar (Populus pruinosa) in response to continuous salinity stress.Plant cell reports · 2014Article
- Transcriptome differences between two sister desert poplar species under salt stress.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Speciation of two desert poplar species triggered by Pleistocene climatic oscillations.Heredity · 2014Article
- Rapidly evolving genes and stress adaptation of two desert poplars, Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa.PloS one · 2013Article
- Barcoding poplars (Populus L.) from western China.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe fixed genetic differences between ecologically divergent species were found to change greatly depending on the markers examined. With such species it is difficult to differentiate between shared ancestral polymorphisms and past introgressions between the diverging species. In order to disentangle these possibilities and provide a further case for DNA barcoding of plants, we examine genetic differentiation between two ecologically divergent poplar species, Populus euphratica Oliver and P. pruinosa Schrenk using three different types of genetic marker. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe genotyped 290 individuals from 29 allopatric and sympatric populations, using chloroplast (cp) DNA, nuclear (nr) ITS sequences and eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci. Three major cpDNA haplotypes were widely shared between the two species and between-species cpDNA differentiation (F(CT)) was very low, even lower than among single species populations. The average SSR F(CT) values were higher. Bayesian clustering analysis of all loci allowed a clear delineation of the two species. Gene flow, determined by examining all SSR loci, was obvious but only slightly asymmetrical. However, the two species were almost fixed for two different nrITS genotypes that had the highest F(CT), although a few introgressed individuals were detected both in allopatric and sympatric populations.
conclusionsThe two species shared numerous ancestral polymorphisms at cpDNA and a few SSR loci. Both ITS and a combination of nuclear SSR data could be used to differentiate between the two species. Introgressions and gene flow were obvious between the two species either during or after their divergence. Our findings underscore the complex genetic differentiations between ecologically diverged species and highlight the importance of nuclear DNA (especially ITS) differentiation for delimiting closely related plant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.