ArticlePLoS computational biology2011
Patient-specific data fusion defines prognostic cancer subtypes.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of disability-free survival at 5 years after surgery: a prospective observational study.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Integrative Mixed Modeling Framework for Analysis of the Multi-Site Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study.Data science in science · 2026Article
- Multi-omics to study chronic respiratory diseases and viral infections.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- BAYESIAN LEARNING OF CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL SEPSIS PHENOTYPES IN NORTHERN TANZANIA.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- Multi-Omics Integration in Nephrology: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Seminars in nephrology · 2024Review
- MoNETA: MultiOmics Network Embedding for SubType Analysis.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis and Validation of Potential Markers Associated with Prediction and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Covering Hierarchical Dirichlet Mixture Models on binary data to enhance genomic stratifications in onco-hematology.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Integrating omics atlas in health informatics system design-an opinion article.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Patient-centric knowledge graphs: a survey of current methods, challenges, and applications.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Applications of multi-omics analysis in human diseases.MedComm · 2023Review
- Statistical analysis of high-dimensional biomedical data: a gentle introduction to analytical goals, common approaches and challenges.BMC medicine · 2023Review
- A Machine Learning-Based Approach Using Multi-omics Data to Predict Metabolic Pathways.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- A Drug Repurposing Pipeline Based on Bladder Cancer Integrated Proteotranscriptomics Signatures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Machine learning: its challenges and opportunities in plant system biology.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Unsupervised Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Evaluation and comparison of multi-omics data integration methods for cancer subtyping.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Integrative Multi-Omics Approaches in Cancer Research: From Biological Networks to Clinical Subtypes.Molecules and cells · 2021Review
- Mergeomics 2.0: a web server for multi-omics data integration to elucidate disease networks and predict therapeutics.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Clustering of cancer data based on Stiefel manifold for multiple views.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Different data types can offer complementary perspectives on the same biological phenomenon. In cancer studies, for example, data on copy number alterations indicate losses and amplifications of genomic regions in tumours, while transcriptomic data point to the impact of genomic and environmental events on the internal wiring of the cell. Fusing different data provides a more comprehensive model of the cancer cell than that offered by any single type. However, biological signals in different patients exhibit diverse degrees of concordance due to cancer heterogeneity and inherent noise in the measurements. This is a particularly important issue in cancer subtype discovery, where personalised strategies to guide therapy are of vital importance. We present a nonparametric Bayesian model for discovering prognostic cancer subtypes by integrating gene expression and copy number variation data. Our model is constructed from a hierarchy of Dirichlet Processes and addresses three key challenges in data fusion: (i) To separate concordant from discordant signals, (ii) to select informative features, (iii) to estimate the number of disease subtypes. Concordance of signals is assessed individually for each patient, giving us an additional level of insight into the underlying disease structure. We exemplify the power of our model in prostate cancer and breast cancer and show that it outperforms competing methods. In the prostate cancer data, we identify an entirely new subtype with extremely poor survival outcome and show how other analyses fail to detect it. In the breast cancer data, we find subtypes with superior prognostic value by using the concordant results. These discoveries were crucially dependent on our model's ability to distinguish concordant and discordant signals within each patient sample, and would otherwise have been missed. We therefore demonstrate the importance of taking a patient-specific approach, using highly-flexible nonparametric Bayesian methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.