Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22028635›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2011

Replication timing: a fingerprint for cell identity and pluripotency.

Tyrone Ryba, Ichiro Hiratani, Takayo Sasaki, Dana Battaglia, Michael Kulik, Jinfeng Zhang, Stephen Dalton, David M Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nuclear architecture and the structural basis of mitotic memory.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Control of DNA replication timing in the 3D genome.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tyrone RybaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America.
Ichiro Hiratani
Takayo Sasaki
Dana Battaglia
Michael Kulik
Jinfeng Zhang
Stephen Dalton
David M Gilbert

Funding

UNDERSTANDING MECHANISMS OF hESC SELF-RENEWAL AND CELL FATE COMMITMENTP01GM085354 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$18.3M
Embryonic stem cell renewal-Myc transcription factorsR01HD049647 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS HD049647NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049647NIGMS NIH HHS GM085354NIGMS NIH HHS GM75334NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM085354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many types of epigenetic profiling have been used to classify stem cells, stages of cellular differentiation, and cancer subtypes. Existing methods focus on local chromatin features such as DNA methylation and histone modifications that require extensive analysis for genome-wide coverage. Replication timing has emerged as a highly stable cell type-specific epigenetic feature that is regulated at the megabase-level and is easily and comprehensively analyzed genome-wide. Here, we describe a cell classification method using 67 individual replication profiles from 34 mouse and human cell lines and stem cell-derived tissues, including new data for mesendoderm, definitive endoderm, mesoderm and smooth muscle. Using a Monte-Carlo approach for selecting features of replication profiles conserved in each cell type, we identify "replication timing fingerprints" unique to each cell type and apply a k nearest neighbor approach to predict known and unknown cell types. Our method correctly classifies 67/67 independent replication-timing profiles, including those derived from closely related intermediate stages. We also apply this method to derive fingerprints for pluripotency in human and mouse cells. Interestingly, the mouse pluripotency fingerprint overlaps almost completely with previously identified genomic segments that switch from early to late replication as pluripotency is lost. Thereafter, replication timing and transcription within these regions become difficult to reprogram back to pluripotency, suggesting these regions highlight an epigenetic barrier to reprogramming. In addition, the major histone cluster Hist1 consistently becomes later replicating in committed cell types, and several histone H1 genes in this cluster are downregulated during differentiation, suggesting a possible instrument for the chromatin compaction observed during differentiation. Finally, we demonstrate that unknown samples can be classified independently using site-specific PCR against fingerprint regions. In sum, replication fingerprints provide a comprehensive means for cell characterization and are a promising tool for identifying regions with cell type-specific organization.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineChromatinDNA FingerprintingDNA MethylationDNA Replication TimingEmbryonic Stem CellsEndodermEpigenomicsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHistonesHumansMesodermMiceMonte Carlo MethodMuscle, SmoothChromatinHistones

Identifiers

PMID22028635
PMCPMC3197641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.