ArticlePLoS computational biology2011
Replication timing: a fingerprint for cell identity and pluripotency.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcription elongation can be sufficient, but is not necessary, to advance replication timing.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- RIF1 controls replication timing in early mouse embryos independently of lamina-associated nuclear organization.Developmental cell · 2025Article
- Transcription can be sufficient, but is not necessary, to advance replication timing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Detection and characterization of constitutive replication origins defined by DNA polymerase epsilon.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Nuclear architecture and the structural basis of mitotic memory.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023Review
- Yeast ORC sumoylation status fine-tunes origin licensing.Genes & development · 2022Article
- Low Replicative Stress Triggers Cell-Type Specific Inheritable Advanced Replication Timing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Chromatin Network Analyses: Towards Structure-Function Relationships in Epigenomics.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Pluripotent stem cells with low differentiation potential contain incompletely reprogrammed DNA replication.The Journal of cell biology · 2020Article
- Control of DNA replication timing in the 3D genome.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019Review
- Replication timing networks reveal a link between transcription regulatory circuits and replication timing control.Genome research · 2019Article
- Single-cell DNA replication profiling identifies spatiotemporal developmental dynamics of chromosome organization.Nature genetics · 2019Article
- Rapid Irreversible Transcriptional Reprogramming in Human Stem Cells Accompanied by Discordance between Replication Timing and Chromatin Compartment.Stem cell reports · 2019Article
- RT States: systematic annotation of the human genome using cell type-specific replication timing programs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Linking the organization of DNA replication with genome maintenance.Current genetics · 2019Review
- Article
- Article
- Shortest path counting in probabilistic biological networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many types of epigenetic profiling have been used to classify stem cells, stages of cellular differentiation, and cancer subtypes. Existing methods focus on local chromatin features such as DNA methylation and histone modifications that require extensive analysis for genome-wide coverage. Replication timing has emerged as a highly stable cell type-specific epigenetic feature that is regulated at the megabase-level and is easily and comprehensively analyzed genome-wide. Here, we describe a cell classification method using 67 individual replication profiles from 34 mouse and human cell lines and stem cell-derived tissues, including new data for mesendoderm, definitive endoderm, mesoderm and smooth muscle. Using a Monte-Carlo approach for selecting features of replication profiles conserved in each cell type, we identify "replication timing fingerprints" unique to each cell type and apply a k nearest neighbor approach to predict known and unknown cell types. Our method correctly classifies 67/67 independent replication-timing profiles, including those derived from closely related intermediate stages. We also apply this method to derive fingerprints for pluripotency in human and mouse cells. Interestingly, the mouse pluripotency fingerprint overlaps almost completely with previously identified genomic segments that switch from early to late replication as pluripotency is lost. Thereafter, replication timing and transcription within these regions become difficult to reprogram back to pluripotency, suggesting these regions highlight an epigenetic barrier to reprogramming. In addition, the major histone cluster Hist1 consistently becomes later replicating in committed cell types, and several histone H1 genes in this cluster are downregulated during differentiation, suggesting a possible instrument for the chromatin compaction observed during differentiation. Finally, we demonstrate that unknown samples can be classified independently using site-specific PCR against fingerprint regions. In sum, replication fingerprints provide a comprehensive means for cell characterization and are a promising tool for identifying regions with cell type-specific organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.