Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22027693›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2012

A systems biology approach identifies SART1 as a novel determinant of both 5-fluorouracil and SN38 drug resistance in colorectal cancer.

Wendy L Allen, Leanne Stevenson, Vicky M Coyle, Puthen V Jithesh, Irina Proutski, Gail Carson, Michael A Gordon, Heinz-Josef D Lenz, Sandra Van Schaeybroeck, Daniel B Longley and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Partial Depletion of SART1 Selectively Induces Mitotic Defects and Cell Death in Cancer Cells.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Secretory exosomes from modified immune cells against cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ACells · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy L AllenCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Leanne Stevenson
Vicky M Coyle
Puthen V Jithesh
Irina Proutski
Gail Carson
Michael A Gordon
Heinz-Josef D Lenz
Sandra Van Schaeybroeck
Daniel B Longley
Patrick G Johnston
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13172Cancer Research UK 13721Cancer Research UK A7402Cancer Research UK C212/A7402Department of Health RRG/3261/05Department of Health RRG 6.42Medical Research Council G0400302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy response rates for advanced colorectal cancer remain disappointingly low, primarily because of drug resistance, so there is an urgent need to improve current treatment strategies. To identify novel determinants of resistance to the clinically relevant drugs 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and SN38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan), transcriptional profiling experiments were carried out on pretreatment metastatic colorectal cancer biopsies and HCT116 parental and chemotherapy-resistant cell line models using a disease-specific DNA microarray. To enrich for potential chemoresistance-determining genes, an unsupervised bioinformatics approach was used, and 50 genes were selected and then functionally assessed using custom-designed short interfering RNA (siRNA) screens. In the primary siRNA screen, silencing of 21 genes sensitized HCT116 cells to either 5-FU or SN38 treatment. Three genes (RAPGEF2, PTRF, and SART1) were selected for further analysis in a panel of 5 colorectal cancer cell lines. Silencing SART1 sensitized all 5 cell lines to 5-FU treatment and 4/5 cell lines to SN38 treatment. However, silencing of RAPGEF2 or PTRF had no significant effect on 5-FU or SN38 sensitivity in the wider cell line panel. Further functional analysis of SART1 showed that its silencing induced apoptosis that was caspase-8 dependent. Furthermore, silencing of SART1 led to a downregulation of the caspase-8 inhibitor, c-FLIP, which we have previously shown is a key determinant of drug resistance in colorectal cancer. This study shows the power of systems biology approaches for identifying novel genes that regulate drug resistance and identifies SART1 as a previously unidentified regulator of c-FLIP and drug-induced activation of caspase-8.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicApoptosisCamptothecinCASP8 and FADD-Like Apoptosis Regulating ProteinCaspase 8Cell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingAntigens, NeoplasmAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinCASP8 and FADD-Like Apoptosis Regulating ProteinCASP8 protein, humanCaspase 8CFLAR protein, humanFluorouracilIrinotecanRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearRNA, Small InterferingSART1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22027693
PMCPMC3272421
OpenAlexW2106888030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.