ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011
Impact of the spotted microarray preprocessing method on fold-change compression and variance stability.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-dimensional Multi-omics Integrative Study to Identify Target Genes for Ischemic Stroke and Related Chronic Pain.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Identification of heterogeneity and common characteristics in colorectal carcinoma located in distinct sites.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated Network Analysis Decipher ZNF384-Related miR-20b-5p and miR-424-5p in Colon Adenocarcinoma.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Single high-dose intravenous injection of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cell exerts protective effects in a rat model of metabolic syndrome.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- Profile of the RNA in exosomes from astrocytes and microglia using deep sequencing: implications for neurodegeneration mechanisms.Neural regeneration research · 2022Article
- Unearthing of Key Genes Driving the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease via Bioinformatics.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Assessment of Post-Radiation Time Effect on Gene Expression Profiles ofJournal of lasers in medical sciences · 2021Article
- Food Phenotyping: Recording and Processing of Non-Targeted Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Data for Verifying Food Authenticity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Genome-Wide Transcriptional and Functional Analysis of Human T Lymphocytes Treated with Benzo[International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Independent prognostic genes and mechanism investigation for colon cancer.Biological research · 2018Article
- Article
- Tracking Cancer Genetic Evolution using OncoTrack.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A nested parallel experiment demonstrates differences in intensity-dependence between RNA-seq and microarrays.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- PLAU inferred from a correlation network is critical for suppressor function of regulatory T cells.Molecular systems biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe standard approach for preprocessing spotted microarray data is to subtract the local background intensity from the spot foreground intensity, to perform a log2 transformation and to normalize the data with a global median or a lowess normalization. Although well motivated, standard approaches for background correction and for transformation have been widely criticized because they produce high variance at low intensities. Whereas various alternatives to the standard background correction methods and to log2 transformation were proposed, impacts of both successive preprocessing steps were not compared in an objective way.
resultsIn this study, we assessed the impact of eight preprocessing methods combining four background correction methods and two transformations (the log2 and the glog), by using data from the MAQC study. The current results indicate that most preprocessing methods produce fold-change compression at low intensities. Fold-change compression was minimized using the Standard and the Edwards background correction methods coupled with a log2 transformation. The drawback of both methods is a high variance at low intensities which consequently produced poor estimations of the p-values. On the other hand, effective stabilization of the variance as well as better estimations of the p-values were observed after the glog transformation.
conclusionAs both fold-change magnitudes and p-values are important in the context of microarray class comparison studies, we therefore recommend to combine the Edwards correction with a hybrid transformation method that uses the log2 transformation to estimate fold-change magnitudes and the glog transformation to estimate p-values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.