Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22026929›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2011

Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis.

Daniel H Kett, Andrew F Shorr, Annette C Reboli, Arlene L Reisman, Pinaki Biswas, Haran T Schlamm

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00058682 (A Phase III, Double Blind, Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Anidulafungin VS. Fluconazole in the Treatment of Patients With Candidemia and Other Forms of Invasive Candidiasis and Prevention of Complications), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00058682 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Double Blind, Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Anidulafungin VS. Fluconazole in the Treatment of Patients With Candidemia and Other Forms of Invasive Candidiasis and Prevention of Complications

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2003 to 2005Enrolled248ConditionsCandida, CandidiasisArmsAnidulafungin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia/invasive candidiasis in selected critically ill patients.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2012
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Early Empirical Anidulafungin Reduces the Prevalence of Invasive Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients: A Case-control Study.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel H KettThe Miller School of Medicine at the University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1611 NW 12th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136, USA. dkett@med.miami.edu
Andrew F Shorr
Annette C Reboli
Arlene L Reisman
Pinaki Biswas
Haran T Schlamm
Pfizer (United States) · USCooper Medical School of Rowan University · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the past decade, the incidence of Candida infections in hospitalized patients has increased, with fluconazole being the most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agent for these infections. However, the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines recommend an echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia/invasive candidiasis in patients who are considered to be "moderately severe or severely" ill. To validate these guidelines, clinical trial data were reviewed.

methodsA secondary analysis of data from a previously published prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed; it compared anidulafungin with fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia. Patients with critical illness were identified at study entry by using the following criteria: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of ≥ 15, evidence of severe sepsis (sepsis and one or more end-organ dysfunctions) present, and/or patient was in intensive care. Global response rates were compared at the end of intravenous study treatment (the primary end point of the original study) and all-cause mortality at 14 and 28 days from study entry in this group.

resultsThe patients (163 (66.5%) of 245) fulfilled at least one criterion for critical illness (anidulafungin, n = 89; fluconazole, n = 74). No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups. The global response rate was 70.8% for anidulafungin and 54.1% for fluconazole (P = 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0 to 31.5); all-cause mortality was 10.1% versus 20.3% at 14 days (P = 0.08; 95% CI, -0.9 to 21.3) and was 20.2% versus 24.3% at 28 days (P = 0.57; 95% CI, -8.8 to 17.0) for anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively.

conclusionsIn this post hoc analysis, anidulafungin was more effective than fluconazole for treatment of severely ill patients with candidemia, thus supporting the 2009 IDSA guidelines.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00058682.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAgedAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsCandidemiaCandidiasis, InvasiveDouble-Blind MethodEchinocandinsFemaleFluconazoleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesSocieties, MedicalAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID22026929
PMCPMC3334804
OpenAlexW2139545538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.