Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22026912›Full record

ArticleNutrition and cancer2011

Dietary intake, food processing, and cooking methods among Amish and non-Amish adults living in Ohio Appalachia: relevance to nutritional risk factors for cancer.

Gebra B Cuyun Carter, Mira L Katz, Amy K Ferketich, Steven K Clinton, Elizabeth M Grainger, Electra D Paskett, Clara D Bloomfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition and cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The GGLEAM Study: Understanding Glaucoma in the Ohio Amish.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk factors forEpidemiology and infection · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gebra B Cuyun CarterCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Mira L Katz
Amy K Ferketich
Steven K Clinton
Elizabeth M Grainger
Electra D Paskett
Clara D Bloomfield
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENTP50CA105632 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 2003 to 2016
$17.2M
Patient Activation To Increase Colon Cancer ScreeningK07CA107079 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, MIRA L · 2005 to 2009
$783k
NCI NIH HHS 1 P50CA015632NCI NIH HHS 5 P30CA16058-31NCI NIH HHS K07 CA107079NCI NIH HHS K07 # CA 107079NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P50 CA105632NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study's purpose was to examine the source, storage, preparation, and intake of food among Amish and non-Amish adults to understand dietary practices as a potential contributing factor to lower cancer incidence rates. Interviews were conducted with a random sample of 134 Amish and 154 non-Amish adults including questions about dietary practices and a 24-h dietary recall. Amish compared to non-Amish adults reported (1) less refrigeration in homes (85% vs. 100%, P < .01); (2) rarely/never obtaining food from restaurants and grocery stores (P < .01); (3) consuming less alcohol (P < .01); (4) consuming fewer daily servings of vegetables (males: 1.2 vs. 1.9 servings/day, P < .01; females: 1.0 vs. 2.1 servings/day, P < .01); and (5) a greater percentage of energy from saturated fat (males: 16.7% vs. 12.6%, P < .01; females: 16.3% vs. 12.0%, P < .01). Amish males reported greater amount of energy intake (2780 kcal vs. 2298 kcal, P = .03) compared to non-Amish males. Amish and non-Amish dietary patterns show some differences that may impact cancer although neither group achieves current diet and cancer prevention guidelines. Lifestyle factors, screening, and healthcare access may be contributing to the lower cancer incidence rates among the Amish and these results suggest areas of intervention to reduce the cancer burden.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFeeding BehaviorAdultAgedAmishCookingCross-Sectional StudiesDietDietary FatsDietary FiberFemaleFood PreservativesFruitHumansInterviews as TopicLife StyleDietary FatsDietary FiberFood Preservatives

Identifiers

PMID22026912
PMCPMC3800012
OpenAlexW2067035751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.