Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22026481›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2011

Canadian Optically-guided approach for Oral Lesions Surgical (COOLS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Catherine F Poh, J Scott Durham, Penelope M Brasher, Donald W Anderson, Kenneth W Berean, Calum E MacAulay, J Jack Lee, Miriam P Rosin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01039298 (Canadian Optically Guided Approach for Oral Lesions Surgical Trial - COOLS), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01039298 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Canadian Optically Guided Approach for Oral Lesions Surgical Trial - COOLS

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2013 to 2015Enrolled200ConditionsOral Cancer, High-grade PrecancerArmsFluorescence visualization device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Autofluorescence Image-Guided Endoscopy in the Management of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Tumors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. BMJ open · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine F PohDepartment of Oral Biological and Medical Science, The University of British Columbia, Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, Canada. cpoh@interchange.ubc.ca
J Scott Durham
Penelope M Brasher
Donald W Anderson
Kenneth W Berean
Calum E MacAulay
J Jack Lee
Miriam P Rosin

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral cancer is a major health problem worldwide. The 5-year survival rate ranges from 30-60%, and has remained unchanged in the past few decades. This is mainly due to late diagnosis and high recurrence of the disease. Of the patients who receive treatment, up to one third suffer from a recurrence or a second primary tumor. It is apparent that one major cause of disease recurrence is clinically unrecognized field changes which extend beyond the visible tumor boundary. We have previously developed an approach using fluorescence visualization (FV) technology to improve the recognition of the field at risk surrounding a visible oral cancer that needs to be removed and preliminary results have shown a significant reduction in recurrence rates. METHOD/

designThis paper describes the study design of a randomized, multi-centre, double blind, controlled surgical trial, the COOLS trial. Nine institutions across Canada will recruit a total of 400 patients with oral severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (N = 160) and invasive squamous cell carcinoma (N = 240). Patients will be stratified by participating institution and histology grade and randomized equally into FV-guided surgery (experimental arm) or white light-guided surgery (control arm). The primary endpoint is a composite of recurrence at or 1 cm within the previous surgery site with 1) the same or higher grade histology compared to the initial diagnosis (i.e., the diagnosis used for randomization); or 2) further treatment due to the presence of severe dysplasia or higher degree of change at follow-up. This is the first randomized, multi-centre trial to validate the effectiveness of the FV-guided surgery. DISCUSSION: In this paper we described the strategies, novelty, and challenges of this unique trial involving a surgical approach guided by the FV technology. The success of the trial requires training, coordination, and quality assurance across multiple sites within Canada. The COOLS trial, an example of translational research, may result in reduced recurrence rates following surgical treatment of early-stage oral cancer with significant impacts on survival, morbidity, patients' quality of life and the cost to the health care system.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01039298.

Indexed as

FluorescenceCanadaCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Squamous CellCost-Benefit AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMouth NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurgery, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID22026481
PMCPMC3226575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.