Trial reportBMC cancer2011
Canadian Optically-guided approach for Oral Lesions Surgical (COOLS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01039298 (Canadian Optically Guided Approach for Oral Lesions Surgical Trial - COOLS), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Canadian Optically Guided Approach for Oral Lesions Surgical Trial - COOLS
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Effect of Fluorescence Visualization-Guided Surgery on Local Recurrence of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2020Trial
- Two-color fluorescence-guided surgery for head and neck cancer resections.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Autofluorescence Image-Guided Endoscopy in the Management of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Tumors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Quantitative nuclear phenotype signatures predict nodal disease in oral squamous cell carcinoma.PloS one · 2021Article
- Tumor microRNA profile and prognostic value for lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients.Oncotarget · 2020Article
- In-vivo optical imaging in head and neck oncology: basic principles, clinical applications and future directions.International journal of oral science · 2018Review
- Plasma-Derived Inflammatory Proteins Predict Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Using Loss of Heterozygosity to Manage Premalignant Oral Dysplasia in British Columbia, Canada.The oncologist · 2016Article
- The status of contemporary image-guided modalities in oncologic surgery.Annals of surgery · 2015Review
- Automated classification of oral premalignant lesions using image cytometry and Random Forests-based algorithms.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2014Article
- Novel antioxidants are not toxic to normal tissues but effectively kill cancer cells.Cancer biology & therapy · 2013Article
- Ex vivo confocal imaging with contrast agents for the detection of oral potentially malignant lesions.Oral oncology · 2013Article
- High-Resolution Optical Imaging of Benign and Malignant Mucosa in the Upper Aerodigestive Tract: An Atlas for Image-Guided Surgery.ISRN minimally invasive surgery · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral cancer is a major health problem worldwide. The 5-year survival rate ranges from 30-60%, and has remained unchanged in the past few decades. This is mainly due to late diagnosis and high recurrence of the disease. Of the patients who receive treatment, up to one third suffer from a recurrence or a second primary tumor. It is apparent that one major cause of disease recurrence is clinically unrecognized field changes which extend beyond the visible tumor boundary. We have previously developed an approach using fluorescence visualization (FV) technology to improve the recognition of the field at risk surrounding a visible oral cancer that needs to be removed and preliminary results have shown a significant reduction in recurrence rates. METHOD/
designThis paper describes the study design of a randomized, multi-centre, double blind, controlled surgical trial, the COOLS trial. Nine institutions across Canada will recruit a total of 400 patients with oral severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (N = 160) and invasive squamous cell carcinoma (N = 240). Patients will be stratified by participating institution and histology grade and randomized equally into FV-guided surgery (experimental arm) or white light-guided surgery (control arm). The primary endpoint is a composite of recurrence at or 1 cm within the previous surgery site with 1) the same or higher grade histology compared to the initial diagnosis (i.e., the diagnosis used for randomization); or 2) further treatment due to the presence of severe dysplasia or higher degree of change at follow-up. This is the first randomized, multi-centre trial to validate the effectiveness of the FV-guided surgery. DISCUSSION: In this paper we described the strategies, novelty, and challenges of this unique trial involving a surgical approach guided by the FV technology. The success of the trial requires training, coordination, and quality assurance across multiple sites within Canada. The COOLS trial, an example of translational research, may result in reduced recurrence rates following surgical treatment of early-stage oral cancer with significant impacts on survival, morbidity, patients' quality of life and the cost to the health care system.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01039298.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.