Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22026449›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2011

An in vitro co-culture model of esophageal cells identifies ascorbic acid as a modulator of cell competition.

Lauren M F Merlo, Rachelle E Kosoff, Kristin L Gardiner, Carlo C Maley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms and pathophysiology of Barrett oesophagus.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tumorigenesis: it takes a village.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2015
    Review
  7. Cancer across the tree of life: cooperation and cheating in multicellularity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren M F MerloThe Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. lmf.merlo@gmail.com
Rachelle E Kosoff
Kristin L Gardiner
Carlo C Maley
The Wistar Institute · USUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
PHYLOGENIES of Barrett's Esophagus LineagesP01CA091955 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 2002 to 2019
$35.9M
Modeling Neoplastic Progression in Barrett's Esophagus - Renewal -2R01CA140657 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Carlo Maley · 2009 to 2026
$5.0M
MSM Scales of carcinogenesis: cells, crypts and cancerR01CA119224 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LUEBECK, GEORG E · 2005 to 2007
$799k
An Intra-Neoplasm Genetic Diversity AssayR03CA137811 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI MALEY, CARLO · 2008 to 2009
$163k
The role of selection and genetic diversity in cancer progressionF32CA132450 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI MERLO, LAUREN · 2008 to 2009
$101k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA132450NCI NIH HHS P01 CA091955NCI NIH HHS P01CA091955NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815NCI NIH HHS R01 CA119224NCI NIH HHS R01CA140657NCI NIH HHS R03 CA137811NCI NIH HHS R03CA137811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evolutionary dynamics between interacting heterogeneous cell types are fundamental properties of neoplastic progression but can be difficult to measure and quantify. Cancers are heterogeneous mixtures of mutant clones but the direct effect of interactions between these clones is rarely documented. The implicit goal of most preventive interventions is to bias competition in favor of normal cells over neoplastic cells. However, this is rarely explicitly tested. Here we have developed a cell culture competition model to allow for direct observation of the effect of chemopreventive or therapeutic agents on two interacting cell types. We have examined competition between normal and Barrett's esophagus cell lines, in the hopes of identifying a system that could screen for potential chemopreventive agents.

methodsOne fluorescently-labeled normal squamous esophageal cell line (EPC2-hTERT) was grown in competition with one of four Barrett's esophagus cell lines (CP-A, CP-B, CP-C, CP-D) under varying conditions and the outcome of competition measured over 14 days by flow cytometry.

resultsWe demonstrate that ascorbic acid (vitamin C) can help squamous cells outcompete Barrett's cells in this system. We are also able to show that ascorbic acid's boost to the relative fitness of squamous cells was increased in most cases by mimicking the pH conditions of gastrointestinal reflux in the lower esophagus.

conclusionsThis model is able to integrate differential fitness effects on various cell types, allowing us to simultaneously capture effects on interacting cell types without having to perform separate experiments. This model system may be used to screen for new classes of cancer prevention agents designed to modulate the competition between normal and neoplastic cells.

Indexed as

ApoptosisAscorbic AcidBarrett EsophagusCell Line, TransformedCell ProliferationCoculture TechniquesEpidermal Growth FactorEpithelial CellsEsophagusHumansAscorbic AcidEpidermal Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID22026449
PMCPMC3213018
OpenAlexW2000977462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.