ReviewScience progress2011
Specific T-cell activation in an unspecific T-cell repertoire.
Review in Science progress, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- MHC-II alleles shape the CDR3 repertoires of conventional and regulatory naïve CD4Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- High-throughput sequencing of the T-cell receptor repertoire: pitfalls and opportunities.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Specificity, Privacy, and Degeneracy in the CD4 T Cell Receptor Repertoire Following Immunization.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- Methods for diversity and overlap analysis in T-cell receptor populations.Journal of mathematical biology · 2013Article
- Co-Receptor CD8-Mediated Modulation of T-Cell Receptor Functional Sensitivity and Epitope Recognition Degeneracy.Frontiers in immunology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
T-cells are a vital type of white blood cell that circulate around our bodies, scanning for cellular abnormalities and infections. They recognise disease-associated antigens via a surface receptor called the T-cell antigen receptor (TCR). If there were a specific TCR for every single antigen, no mammal could possibly contain all the T-cells it needs. This is clearly absurd and suggests that T-cell recognition must, to the contrary, be highly degenerate. Yet highly promiscuous TCRs would appear to be equally impossible: they are bound to recognise self as well as non-self antigens. We review how contributions from mathematical analysis have helped to resolve the paradox of the promiscuous TCR. Combined experimental and theoretical work shows that TCR degeneracy is essentially dynamical in nature, and that the T-cell can differentially adjust its functional sensitivity to the salient epitope, "tuning up" sensitivity to the antigen associated with disease and "tuning down" sensitivity to antigens associated with healthy conditions. This paradigm of continual modulation affords the TCR repertoire, despite its limited numerical diversity, the flexibility to respond to almost any antigenic challenge while avoiding autoimmunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.