Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22025990›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2011

Combined acoustic and optical trapping.

G Thalhammer, R Steiger, M Meinschad, M Hill, S Bernet, M Ritsch-Marte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optical sorting: past, present and future.Light, science & applications · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. LaserScience advances · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Label-free chemical imaging flow cytometry by high-speed multicolor stimulated Raman scattering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Acoustic force measurements on polymer-coated microbubbles in a microfluidic device.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

G Thalhammer
R Steiger
M Meinschad
M Hill
S Bernet
M Ritsch-Marte

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining several methods for contact free micro-manipulation of small particles such as cells or micro-organisms provides the advantages of each method in a single setup. Optical tweezers, which employ focused laser beams, offer very precise and selective handling of single particles. On the other hand, acoustic trapping with wavelengths of about 1 mm allows the simultaneous trapping of many, comparatively large particles. With conventional approaches it is difficult to fully employ the strengths of each method due to the different experimental requirements. Here we present the combined optical and acoustic trapping of motile micro-organisms in a microfluidic environment, utilizing optical macro-tweezers, which offer a large field of view and working distance of several millimeters and therefore match the typical range of acoustic trapping. We characterize the acoustic trapping forces with the help of optically trapped particles and present several applications of the combined optical and acoustic trapping, such as manipulation of large (75 μm) particles and active particle sorting.

Indexed as

(110.7170) Ultrasound(140.7010) Laser trapping(170.4520) Optical confinement and manipulation(350.4855) Optical tweezers or optical manipulation

Identifiers

PMID22025990
PMCPMC3190962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.