Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22025432›Full record

ArticleArchives of internal medicine2011

Primary care utilization and colorectal cancer outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Jeanne M Ferrante, Ellen P McCarthy, Eduardo C Gonzalez, Ji-Hyun Lee, Ren Chen, Kymia Love-Jackson, Richard G Roetzheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patterns of Evidence-Based Care for the Diagnosis, Staging, and First-line Treatment of Breast Cancer by Race-Ethnicity: A SEER-Medicare Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The impact of improving access to primary care.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2017
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Economic burden of colorectal cancer in Korea.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeanne M FerranteDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1 World's Fair Drive, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA. ferranjm@umdnj.edu
Ellen P McCarthy
Eduardo C Gonzalez
Ji-Hyun Lee
Ren Chen
Kymia Love-Jackson
Richard G Roetzheim

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035136NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035139NCI NIH HHS N01-PC-35136NCI NIH HHS N01-PC-35139NCI NIH HHS N02 PC015105NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292PHS HHS U55/CCR921930-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary medical care may improve colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes through increased use of CRC screening tests and earlier diagnosis. We examined the association between primary care utilization and CRC screening, stage at diagnosis, CRC mortality, and all-cause mortality.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients, aged 67 to 85 years, diagnosed as having CRC between 1994 and 2005 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked database. Association of the number of visits to primary care physicians (PCPs) in the 3- to 27-month period before the CRC diagnosis and CRC screening, early-stage diagnosis, CRC mortality, and all-cause mortality were examined using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsThe odds of CRC screening and early-stage diagnosis increased with increasing number of PCP visits (P < .001 for trend). Compared with persons having 0 or 1 PCP visit, patients with 5 to 10 visits had increased odds of ever receiving CRC screening at least 3 months before diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.48-2.72) and early-stage diagnosis (1.35; 1.29-1.42). Persons with 5 to 10 visits had 16% lower CRC mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88) and 6% lower all-cause mortality (0.94; 0.91-0.97) compared with persons with 0 or 1 visit.

conclusionsMedicare beneficiaries with CRC have better outcomes if they have greater utilization of primary care before diagnosis. Revitalization of primary care in the United States may help strengthen the national efforts to reduce the burden of CRC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMedical Record LinkageMedicareMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioOffice VisitsPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID22025432
PMCPMC4605425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.