Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22025151›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2011

S0356: a phase II clinical and prospective molecular trial with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and external-beam radiation therapy before surgery for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Lawrence P Leichman, Bryan H Goldman, Pierre O Bohanes, Heinz J Lenz, Charles R Thomas, Kevin G Billingsley, Christopher L Corless, Syma Iqbal, Philip J Gold, Jacqueline K Benedetti and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response-Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Randomized, Phase II Study Prospectively Evaluating Treatment of Metastatic Esophageal, Gastric, or Gastroesophageal Cancer by Gene Expression ofJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evolving treatment paradigms in esophageal cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Optimal Collaborative Management of Patients With Esophagogastric Cancers.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Current strategies in chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lawrence P LeichmanGastrointestinal Malignancies, Desert Regional Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Aptium Oncology, 1180 N Indian Canyon Dr, Palm Springs, CA 92262; lleichman@aptiumoncology.com.
Bryan H Goldman
Pierre O Bohanes
Heinz J Lenz
Charles R Thomas
Kevin G Billingsley
Christopher L Corless
Syma Iqbal
Philip J Gold
Jacqueline K Benedetti
Kathleen D Danenberg
Charles D Blanke
Cancer Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

SWOG - Foreign Accrual under UMiU10CA032102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D. · 1985 to 2013
$141.3M
SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUP--STATISTICAL CENTERU10CA038926 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LEBLANC, MICHAEL L. · 1985 to 2013
$69.8M
SOUTHEAST CANCER CONTROL COSORTIUM, INCU10CA045808 · NCI · SOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOL RES CONSORTIUM · PI ATKINS, JAMES NORMAN · 1987 to 2013
$26.6M
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035431 · NCI · VIA CHRISTI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAKHIL, SHAKER R · 1985 to 2014
$24.0M
UPSTATE CAROLINA COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035119 · NCI · SPARTANBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI BEARDEN, JAMES D · 1985 to 2013
$21.5M
GRAND RAPIDS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035178 · NCI · SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS · PI PADULA, GILBERT DARIN ANTHONY · 1985 to 2014
$16.2M
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA045807 · NCI · VOLUNTARY HOSPITALS OF AMERICA-ILLINOIS · PI WADE, JAMES L · 1987 to 2014
$16.0M
DAYTON CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035090 · NCI · KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER · PI GROSS, HOWARD M · 1985 to 2014
$12.0M
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA CCOPU10CA067663 · NCI · PRISMA HEALTH - UPSTATE · PI GIGUERE, JEFFREY K · 1995 to 2014
$11.7M
OZARKS REGIONAL COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA045560 · NCI · ST. JOHN'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER · PI CARLSON, JAY W · 1987 to 2014
$8.2M
KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035176 · NCI · NCI COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM · PI GAUR, RAKESH · 1985 to 2014
$8.0M
Montana Cancer Consortium CCOPU10CA067575 · NCI · MONTANA CANCER CONSORTIUM · PI MARCHELLO, BENJAMIN T. · 1995 to 2013
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA12644NCI NIH HHS CA20319NCI NIH HHS CA35090NCI NIH HHS CA35128NCI NIH HHS CA-35176NCI NIH HHS CA35192NCI NIH HHS CA37981NCI NIH HHS CA42777NCI NIH HHS CA45808NCI NIH HHS CA-46113NCI NIH HHS CA46282NCI NIH HHS CA52654NCI NIH HHS CA58416NCI NIH HHS CA58861NCI NIH HHS CA58882NCI NIH HHS CA67663NCI NIH HHS CA68183NCI NIH HHS CA76429NCI NIH HHS CA-76448NCI NIH HHS N01 CA032102NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035119NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035176NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035178NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035431NCI NIH HHS N01 CA038926NCI NIH HHS N01 CA045560NCI NIH HHS N01 CA045807NCI NIH HHS N01 CA046441NCI NIH HHS N01 CA067575NCI NIH HHS U10 CA012644NCI NIH HHS U10 CA020319NCI NIH HHS U10 CA032102NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035090NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035119NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035128NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035176NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035178NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035192NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035431NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037981NCI NIH HHS U10 CA038926NCI NIH HHS U10 CA042777NCI NIH HHS U10 CA045560NCI NIH HHS U10 CA045807NCI NIH HHS U10 CA045808NCI NIH HHS U10 CA046113NCI NIH HHS U10 CA046282NCI NIH HHS U10 CA046441NCI NIH HHS U10 CA052654NCI NIH HHS U10 CA058416NCI NIH HHS U10 CA058861NCI NIH HHS U10 CA058882NCI NIH HHS U10 CA067575NCI NIH HHS U10 CA067663NCI NIH HHS U10 CA068183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with improved survival. The Southwest Oncology Group designed a trimodality, phase II, single-arm trial with objectives of achieving a pCR rate of 40% with prospective exploratory analyses of intratumoral molecular markers postulated to affect response and survival. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with clinically staged II or III esophageal adenocarcinoma received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, and 29; protracted-infusion fluorouracil (PI-FU) 180 mg/m(2)/d on days 8 through 43; and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) 5 days a week at 1.8 Gy/d for 25 fractions; surgery was performed 28 to 42 days after neoadjuvant therapy. Chemotherapy was planned after surgery. Tumors were analyzed for mRNA expression and polymorphisms in genes involved in drug metabolism and DNA repair.

resultsNinety-three patients were evaluable. Two deaths (2.2%) were attributable to preoperative therapy, and two deaths (2.2%) were attributable to surgery. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were recorded for 47.3% and 19.4% of patients, respectively. Seventy-nine patients (84.9%) underwent surgery; 67.7% of patients had R0 resections. Twenty-six patients (28.0%) had confirmed pCR (95% CI, 19.1% to 38.2%). At a median follow-up of 39.2 months, estimates of median and 3-year overall survival (OS) were 28.3 months and 45.1%, respectively. Intratumoral ERCC-1 gene expression was inversely related to progression-free survival and OS.

conclusionNeoadjuvant oxaliplatin, PI-FU, and EBRT for esophageal adenocarcinoma is active and tolerable. Because the regimen failed to meet the primary end point, it does not define a new standard. However, future trials can be built on this platform to validate the role of ERCC-1 in determining the best systemic regimen for individual patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedFluorouracilOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID22025151
PMCPMC3236655
OpenAlexW2145947977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.