ArticleCurrent neurovascular research2011
Combination treatment with rt-PA is more effective than rt-PA alone in an in vitro human clot model.
Article in Current neurovascular research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Doppler sonography enhances rtPA-induced fibrinolysis in an in vitro clot model of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages.PloS one · 2019Article
- Clot retraction affects the extent of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in an ex vivo porcine thrombosis model.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2013Article
- A clinical study of transcranial ultrasound as an adjuvant therapy for progressive cerebral infarction.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2013Article
- Temperature affects thrombolytic efficacy using rt-PA and eptifibatide, an in vitro study.Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management · 2012Article
- Short-term high-dose effect of lovastatin on thrombolysis by rt-PA in a human whole-blood in vitro clot model.Current neurovascular research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Incidence of intra-cranial hemorrhage linked to treatment of ischemic stroke with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has led to interest in adjuvant therapies such as ultrasound (US) or plasminogen, to enhance rt-PA efficacy and improve patient safety. High-frequency US (∼MHz) such as 2-MHz transcranial Doppler (TCD) has demonstrated increased recanalization in situ. Low-frequency US (∼kHz) enhanced thrombolysis (UET) has demonstrated higher lytic capabilities but has been associated with incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage in some clinical trials. In vitro studies using plasminogen have shown enhancement of lysis. This study compared rt-PA-induced lysis using adjuvant therapies, with 120-kHz or 2-MHz pulsed US, or plasminogen, in an in vitro human whole blood clot model. Blood was drawn from 30 subjects after local institutional approval. Clots were exposed to rt-PA at concentrations of 0 to 3.15 μg/ml. Clots were exposed to rt-PA alone (rt-PA) or in combination with plasminogen (Plg), 120-kHz US (120-kHz), or 2-MHz US (2-MHz). Thrombolytic efficacy was determined by assessing the percent fractional clot loss (FCL) at 30 minutes using microscopic imaging. There was no enhancement of lysis for combination therapy with [rt-PA]=0 μg/ml. Adding rt- PA increased lysis for all groups. As [rt-PA] increased, lysis tended to increase for 120-kHz and Plg (FCL: from 50% to 70%, 120-kHz; 65% to 83%, Plg) but not for 2-MHz (58% to 52%). Lytic efficacy in combination therapy depends on rt- PA concentration and the adjuvant therapy type. For non-zero rt-PA concentrations, all combination therapies produced more lysis than rt-PA alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.