Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22023588›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2011

Loss of sexual recombination and segregation is associated with increased diversification in evening primroses.

Marc T J Johnson, Richard G Fitzjohn, Stacey D Smith, Mark D Rausher, Sarah P Otto

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The evolution of floral sonication, a pollen foraging behavior used by bees (Anthophila).Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2018
    Article
  6. Repeated evolution and reversibility of self-fertilization in the volvocine green algae.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2018
    Article
  7. Low recombination rates in sexual species and sex-asex transitions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marc T J JohnsonDepartment of Plant Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. marc.johnson@utoronto.ca
Richard G Fitzjohn
Stacey D Smith
Mark D Rausher
Sarah P Otto

Funding

Evolutionary genetics of flower color in lochroma (Solanaceae)F32GM080082 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, STACEY DEWITT · 2007 to 2009
$142k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM080082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of sexual recombination and segregation in asexual organisms has been portrayed as an irreversible process that commits asexually reproducing lineages to reduced diversification. We test this hypothesis by estimating rates of speciation, extinction, and transition between sexuality and functional asexuality in the evening primroses. Specifically, we estimate these rates using the recently developed BiSSE (Binary State Speciation and Extinction) phylogenetic comparative method, which employs maximum likelihood and Bayesian techniques. We infer that net diversification rates (speciation minus extinction) in functionally asexual evening primrose lineages are roughly eight times faster than diversification rates in sexual lineages, largely due to higher speciation rates in asexual lineages. We further reject the hypothesis that a loss of recombination and segregation is irreversible because the transition rate from functional asexuality to sexuality is significantly greater than zero and in fact exceeded the reverse rate. These results provide the first empirical evidence in support of the alternative theoretical prediction that asexual populations should instead diversify more rapidly than sexual populations because they are free from the homogenizing effects of sexual recombination and segregation. Although asexual reproduction may often constrain adaptive evolution, our results show that the loss of recombination and segregation need not be an evolutionary dead end in terms of diversification of lineages.

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalGenetic SpeciationModels, GeneticPhylogenyBayes TheoremChromosome SegregationLikelihood FunctionsOenotheraRecombination, GeneticReproduction, Asexual

Identifiers

PMID22023588
PMCPMC3202692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.